Keith Thurman is friggin overrated.

[Jc8804]

He still has work to do, and he i willingn to fight anyone at 147.
More rounds vs the divison will help .

[illmaticfighter]

ts,your basically the only person overrating thurman so maybe this thread is about you

[PureBoxingCEO]

Thats basically what happens if your black american and managed by Al Haymon.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I don't agree,I think Thurman get's treated and is viewed accordingly..

[illmaticfighter]

Thats basically what happens if your black american and managed by Al Haymon.

guess i should become a boxer i'm black that's all it takes right?

[QQQQQQQ]

broner-thurman is a 50/50 fight imo. id looovee to see that one.

[dan_cov]

I'm still not sold on him but I do see potential.

I think he still has and needs to develop. Hes not the finished article but there is a good bit to work with.

[UTEP]

He's a good fighter that's calling everybody and their mama out, gotta love that.

nobody's overrating him by the way

I still feel he's better at 154 than 147 though.

[Bushidō]

He's a legit contender. I haven't heard anyone call him Hearns or anything. I do think him vs Broner would be a 50/50 matchup.

[junior gong]

Seem to be a lot of fans treating this guy like the next Tommy Hearns. Yeah he's big and strong for welter and has scored some KOs...but who exactly has he beaten? Has he faced a technician of merit yet?

I see a dude that can **** but also gets real fat after he throws in addition to being off balance. I see no consistent jab either. Not hating, I think he is a fun action fighter but there should be a limit to how much elite status this guy gets--especially now with his resume.

Who's overrating him? He is a very good fighter and definitely one to watch, he's passed every test so far and has a fan friendly style, good power, decent chin, stamina and ever growing ring smarts etc. He is rated about right I reckon. Sometimes I come here and think people either hate boxing or just type in an over emotional way. Weird.