Comments Thread For: Bradley Shakes Head at Marquez Testing: It's a Joke!
Collapse
-
The Juan Manuel Marquez and Timothy Bradley welterweight class scheduled for October 12th seems to have already hit a snag in regards to the random style drug testing that is set to be administered. Bradley has stated in the past that any fighter who signs up to fight him also has to sign up for random anti-doping testing. Marquez says he will comply with Bradley’s request but Bradley will in return have to comply to his own request of not being able to rehydrate more than 10 pounds after their official weigh in. “Bradley he wants to do the anti-doping test. I'm ready for that. But this is a not a rule for the fight. I want after the weigh in, I want Bradley not to [weigh] more than 10 pounds more because he is heavy. He's too big. This is not a rule but if he wants anti-doping test, I want him [not to weigh over] 10 pounds [after the weigh in]” Marquez would reveal.
Here you go,like I said Marquez made an issue about something that both fighters should be happy to do..
Which once again is the reason for people feeling a certain way about Marquez at the moment..Comment
-
For a certain agency,which his conditioning coach may feel more confident in beating(the test)..Why so gong ho for one and not the other??Comment
-
I understand how shady boxing is. But it's easier to pull shady stunts using VADA or USADA, versus NSAC doing the random drug testing. Like I said before, Marquez can intentionally miss tests with either VADA and USADA. And there will be no penalty. VADA in particular will only 'fail' him. USADA, will 'fail' him too but try to push for a suspension or ban. NSAC won't respect it though.
But if NSAC is doing the random testing themselves, and Marquez intentionally misses tests by hiding, he will have to answer questions about it. There can be a penalty because of it. Whereas USADA and VADA, he would get away free! And again, in the future, NSAC can potentially do YEAR ROUND random drug testing, where there are penalties for testing positive.
NSAC is actually the lesser evil.Comment
-
Lol according to your article JMM ready he is willing to comply with Bradley's demand. So what's the issue? Where did he say no like you claimed?http://www.boxingscene.com/marquez-b...testing--66837
Here you go,like I said Marquez made an issue about something that both fighters should be happy to do..
Which once again is the reason for people feeling a certain way about Marquez at the moment..Comment
-
Nope, NSAC would just fine him and put that money in their pockets. USADA would straight out ban him, whilst VADA doesn't have much authority yet in what they can do if an athlete turns in a dirty test because they are a private independent company, USADA is a government run/funded agency... I would be more scared of the NSAC to be honest.I understand how shady boxing is. But it's easier to pull shady stunts using VADA or USADA, versus NSAC doing the random drug testing. Like I said before, Marquez can intentionally miss tests with either VADA and USADA. And there will be no penalty. VADA in particular will only 'fail' him. USADA, will 'fail' him too but try to push for a suspension or ban. NSAC won't respect it though.
But if NSAC is doing the random testing themselves, and Marquez intentionally misses tests by hiding, he will have to answer questions about it. There can be a penalty because of it. Whereas USADA and VADA, he would get away free! And again, in the future, NSAC can potentially do YEAR ROUND random drug testing, where there are penalties for testing positive.
NSAC is actually the lesser evil.Comment
-
This is not true. VADA has only had 2 positive results -- Peterson and Berto. The Peterson case was a scandal where they made several key mistakes.nah, he just knows USADA can be pushed in a certain direction (winky wright tests thrown out, rumored mayweather tests thrown out, morales allowed to fail twice and then test a third time before testing negative)
everytime VADA was used, they busted somebody. this is why bradley wants vada. Heredia told brandon rios (for the pacquiao fight) that USADA is fine. when VADA started coming up, Heredia told Rios he wasn't interested
this isn't hard to figure out people, it isn't a conspiracy, it's business
USADA has had 1 positive result -- Morales. They made some mistakes too.
For 2013 though, both VADA and USADA has had NO positive results. So you're claim that VADA busts everyone is false. Both agencies have had no positive results for 2013. Also, both organizations test for the same things. Neither is better than the other, they both follow the same rules. It's just one is much more expensive -- USADA.Comment
-
USADA would 'ban' him, but NSAC wouldn't follow through with the ban or suspension. NSAC wouldn't respect it, as they like to themselves determine the penalties. So again, it goes back to my point that NSAC doing random drug testing themselves is the lesser evil.Nope, NSAC would just fine him and put that money in their pockets. USADA would straight out ban him, whilst VADA doesn't have much authority yet in what they can do if an athlete turns in a dirty test because they are a private independent company, USADA is a government run/funded agency... I would be more scared of the NSAC to be honest.Comment
-
Another thing is Arum has also claimed that NSAC would be responsible for testing the two fighter from when the fight was announced so where did all these USADA/VADA came from all of a sudden? If Bradley had a problem he needs to look at the fine print of his contract and if he can't read then he needs to get educated people to do so for him.Comment
Comment