Statistically Deontay Wilder is the most dominant force in boxing today.

[RadioBox]

What? It happens all the time

What does that have to do with this thread though?
I don't watch Basketball.. I watch Boxing man.

[SBleeder]

Edwin Valero = GOAT

[RadioBox]

Edwin Valero = GOAT

Stats wise.. Valero is definitely up there among the greatest.

[Spray_resistant]

The objective of boxing is to win the fight not necessarily score a ko though that is always good so TS how does an unbeaten fighter with many more wins and less ko wins related to Wilder and his dominance?

[Hitman932]

This is kind of like saying someone that gets all A+ grades in 5th grade is statistically smarter than a Harvard Economics student who carries a B average.

[SN!PER]

Wilder hits so hard that when he needs firewood for his fireplace, he punches down trees instead of using an axe or chainsaw.

[RadioBox]

This is kind of like saying someone that gets all A+ grades in 5th grade is statistically smarter than a Harvard Economics student who carries a B average.

That's a horrible example dude.
5th Grade is eons below Undergraduate.. That is not even comparable.

Wilder is in the PRO RANKS... He is in the same institution as Wladimir.

5th Grade in boxing terms will be like the YMCA or something.

[RadioBox]

The objective of boxing is to win the fight not necessarily score a ko though that is always good so TS how does an unbeaten fighter with many more wins and less ko wins related to Wilder and his dominance?

He will not be as statistically dominate as Wilder. The object of boxing is to win the fight. I agree with that, but knocking someone out is ALWAYS more dominating than winning a decision.

Wladimir vs Haye and Lewis vs Tua saw Lewis and Wlad won 22 of 24 Rounds.

Those wins did not look as dominant as Tyson vs Spinks.. because Tyson knocked him the **** out in 1 round... So Tyson's win over Spinks was more DOMINANT than Lewis-Tua or Wlad-Haye.

[Spray_resistant]

He will not be as statistically dominate as Wilder. The object of boxing is to win the fight. I agree with that, but knocking someone out is ALWAYS more dominating than winning a decision.

Wladimir vs Haye and Lewis vs Tua saw Lewis and Wlad won 22 of 24 Rounds.

Those wins did not look as dominant as Tyson vs Spinks.. because Tyson knocked him the **** out in 1 round... So Tyson's win over Spinks was more DOMINANT than Lewis-Tua or Wlad-Haye.

Thats like saying a 10-0 10ko prospect is more dominant than a 45 fight vet with no losses and lets say modest power stopping only 20 opponents.

[Citizen Koba]

This thread still even being discussed?

There's at least twice the OPs hypothesis has been refuted in academic terms, and perhaps 30 or 40 in which it's been ridiculed by way of common sense.

I suspect the OPs intention was a joke thread anyway, but he didn't take well to the vitriol that came his way.

Surely, enough already.

This is just silly.