Mayweather or Trout - Who did better against Cotto?
Collapse
-
I say it was about the same. The 2 fights were fought completely different. With Trout there was a lot more trading with Trout obviously getting the better shots in, but he was hit a lot. The fight was close but Trout was the clear winner. With Mayweather it was more defensive but Cotto was more aggressive than we've seen anyone else against Mayweather. Mayweather was hit more than we're use to seeing so it looked more competitive than it was.Comment
-
Trout beat cotto much more impressivly then floyd did, floyd got rough uo at times, cotto never even got started against Trout.
Its only *****s that are trying to convince themself that Canelos win over Trout
that would post such a ****** thread.
Suck on thatComment
-
One thing to take into consideration is that Cotto was much better prepare for Floyd and did not seem to have a game plan nor being at his best for the Trout fight.
IMHO Cotto didnt really consider Trout dangerous or as dangerous and did not train properly nor had the right game plan.
Plus all the other distractors with the high altitude training and drama with his mother makimg him cut his training cycle short.
In all Floyd did better than Trout facing a much better prepared Cotto.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
Comment
-
I think Floyd did slightly better. Cotto landed more punches on Trout than he did on Floyd, despite Trout's significant height and reach advantage, his southpaw stance and the fact that he only fought from a distance.Comment
-
Trout took more powershots. Then he was unable to HURT Cotto despite being the bigger man unlike Floyd, who was smaller than CottoComment
Comment