Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whats more important, fighting to win or fighting to entertain?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Would you rather see you friend/or favorite fighter win or lose a rockem sockem brawl?


    Let's think about this one

    Comment


    • #52
      You can be extremely entertaining but if you lose, that is a bad result.

      Comment


      • #53
        that is what rigo is going thru, he wins but most fans dont think he is entertaining

        Comment


        • #54
          The armchairs will say entertain, fighters will say win. The Superstars of boxing will say both.

          Comment


          • #55
            As a kid my pops always told me idc if u win or lose the fight, just don't go out like no b1tch.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
              Winning. I could care less if people boo me in the crowd if I leave with a win, and my face intact.
              You could care less if people boo you? Could care less? Meaning there is room for you to care less, thus you actually do care if people boo you.









              Comment


              • #57
                POV of a boxer = Winning

                POV of a people's champion = Entertaining, inside and outside of the ring.
                Last edited by RiC-DiC; 07-17-2013, 03:24 AM.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by mathed View Post
                  win first, impress second
                  Yeah, I think this is what it really comes down to.

                  Originally posted by sicko View Post
                  Not a Trainer in the world trains their fighter to be Entertaining, people are trying to change the sport of boxing for their own benefits (HBO!) and for the benefits of the fighter they likely personally
                  That is entirely untrue. A lot of trainers try to get their fighters to have a more offensive output (not to get hit more) which will impress/entertain the people and get them a title shot easier.

                  Saying that trainers don't do that is absolutely 100% BS. It's very, very common for trainers to try and make their fighters more entertaining. Winning is priority, but entertaining is a big part of things.

                  Some that can't entertain much in the ring, have to focus a lot on doing so outside it. Think Malignaggi.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by juandinamita View Post
                    You watch sports to be entertained.
                    No one asked why you watch sports. Answer the question. What's more important, fighting to win or entertain?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
                      Ideally both.

                      Forced to choose one or the other, it depends upon whether you're a fan or a fighter.

                      A fan wants to be entertained, a fighter wants to win.
                      Your overcomplicating things. Its simple. Whats more important. Winning or entertaining? 100% of us all feel that WINNING is OBVIOUSLY more important. But some of us are complicating the question to find ways to say that losing in an entertaining fight, is better.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP