Paulie: Floyd rematched Castillo, Broner should rematch me

[4Corners]

I honestly can't see how you for sure give Paulie any rounds other than 1, 2, 4, and 12. Maybe another round between 5-11, maybe. But during all of those rounds, yes Paulie was active, but Broner was stunning Paulie with lead rights often. More often than Canelo did against Trout, where Trout was active but that was about it.

Broner is good but he's totally different from Floyd. He's more flat footed, and even if he has to move, he doesn't have the footwork of Mayweather at 36, let alone a Floyd from 21-30. Broner will lose. I think he has average to decent defense, a lot of Paulie's landed punches seemed to land on shoulders and arms, at least how I saw it. But he doesn't have the defense of a Mayweather. And though his power is pretty good, even at 147 he'll have pop, Paulie has always had a good solid chin, he's not active enough with his jab.

You'll need just a high volume puncher with power he can respect, and you'll beat Broner.

[Weebler I]

I think Broner beat Paulie more clearly than Floyd beat Castillo in the first fight.

I had Mayweather beating Castillo by a point, Broner-Paulie a draw (1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 Malignaggi, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 Broner).

I don't think anyone really wants to see a rematch though, most people want to see Broner physically hurt at this point by one of the Argentine fighters.

[SplitSecond]

waste of time, paulie didnt win the first time, second time he gets messed up even worse honestly

[Exciterx30]

This fight was very close and had several swing rounds. I saw a 114-114 draw, so I don't think Malignaggi won but he did not lose his title either. A rematch would be interesting but it's a fact that Malignaggi has the skills to box him but will not stop him. That means the fight will, once again, go the distance and there might be controversy. In that case, the fight would be pointless.

The only way this rematch would work would be with a guarantee that judges will be fair. That is never a guarantee in a sport in which big money and future lucrative events are involved.

[Mike Haynes]

Shut up Paulie....you need to rematch Cano.

I had the fight a draw, btw.

[PAC-BOY]

stop whining paulie. you lost. the 117-111 card was ****ty. so was the card that had you winning 115-113. You got the "de la hoya split decision" when you should've lost by a UD.

You can still fight and make another great payday. Just wait until the loser of garcia v matthysse needs an opponent.

hheheheee Paulie lost. Strangely the mass % of the fans disagree with you!:AYWOoD:

[The Big Dunn]

hheheheee Paulie lost. Strangely the mass % of the fans disagree with you!:AYWOoD:

there the same posters that had bradley over manny so I don't take much stock in that.

don't worry. by next april you will be in here with: "Manny beat paulie way better than Broner did".

[-DSG-]

Excellent points. If anything, Broner is likely to improve, not Paulie. Broner was literally walking through Malignaggi's punches. Tough to win fights when your opponent has as much fear of your power as he does the wind in his face.

That's why every time malignaggi punched broner wouldn't do anything.

[Pockets]

Paulie deserves a rematch.

[brickcityboxing]

ok? one judge does not equal a majority. judges are wrong too. we all know this. i dont get what bringing up 1 scorecard out of 3 does for u.

1 judge had Paulie winning and another had broner winning by a point. Both fringe fans ?