Paulie: Floyd rematched Castillo, Broner should rematch me

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Weebler I
    El Weeblerito I
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 31092
    • 1,459
    • 1,648
    • 54,550

    #1

    Paulie: Floyd rematched Castillo, Broner should rematch me

  • The Big Dunn
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 69275
    • 9,488
    • 7,834
    • 287,568

    #2
    stop whining paulie. you lost. the 117-111 card was ****ty. so was the card that had you winning 115-113. You got the "de la hoya split decision" when you should've lost by a UD.

    You can still fight and make another great payday. Just wait until the loser of garcia v matthysse needs an opponent.

    Comment

    • shenmue
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 3773
      • 679
      • 1,942
      • 20,662

      #3
      No thanks, rather the problem gets a problem by fighting someone that can actually punch.

      Comment

      • Weebler I
        El Weeblerito I
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 31092
        • 1,459
        • 1,648
        • 54,550

        #4
        Originally posted by shenmue
        No thanks, rather the problem gets a problem by fighting someone that can actually punch.
        Paulie makes a good point though. When there was controversy Floyd Mayweather rematched Castillo and made it right. Broner never rematched Ponce De Leon or Quintero and he won't rematch Malignaggi either.

        Comment

        • zapdos
          Banned
          • Apr 2013
          • 651
          • 37
          • 7
          • 890

          #5
          Paulie talking punching power.


          Isnt it ironic, dont you think, a little toooo ironic....yeah I really do think (8)

          Comment

          • Kagami Taiga
            Generation of Miracles
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 19078
            • 703
            • 228
            • 40,183

            #6
            Originally posted by The Weebler II
            Paulie makes a good point though. When there was controversy Floyd Mayweather rematched Castillo and made it right. Broner never rematched Ponce De Leon or Quintero and he won't rematch Malignaggi either.
            there is no controversy here. paulie lost clearly. this isnt castillo.

            Comment

            • CubanGuyNYC
              Latin From Manhattan
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 15252
              • 1,615
              • 1,586
              • 112,127

              #7
              Originally posted by DempseyRollin
              there is no controversy here. paulie lost clearly. this isnt castillo.
              Agreed. Beat me to it. The fight was close, but a clear victory for Broner.

              Comment

              • Public_Enemy
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2013
                • 3486
                • 121
                • 548
                • 11,019

                #8
                This was a close but clear decision. There's no need for a rematch at all. Also, there's nothing to suggest that anything would be different in a rematch. To be honest, I think Paulie would fare worse if they stepped in the ring again. Paulie doesn't have any power so there's such a slim chance he would win. There's no more drama in this matchup.

                Comment

                • Weebler I
                  El Weeblerito I
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 31092
                  • 1,459
                  • 1,648
                  • 54,550

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DempseyRollin
                  there is no controversy here. paulie lost clearly. this isnt castillo.
                  Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC
                  Agreed. Beat me to it. The fight was close, but a clear victory for Broner.
                  That's the point, a lot of people disagree both on here, other forums, twitter (as the interviewer noted) and youtube.





                  Originally posted by Public_Enemy
                  This was a close but clear decision. There's no need for a rematch at all. Also, there's nothing to suggest that anything would be different in a rematch. To be honest, I think Paulie would fare worse if they stepped in the ring again. Paulie doesn't have any power so there's such a slim chance he would win. There's no more drama in this matchup.
                  I think it would be the other way around. Malignaggi is the more intelligent fighter and would make more adjustments than Broner.
                  Last edited by Weebler I; 06-25-2013, 08:26 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Kagami Taiga
                    Generation of Miracles
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 19078
                    • 703
                    • 228
                    • 40,183

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Weebler II
                    That's the point, a lot of people disagree both on here, other forums, twitter (as the interviewer noted) and youtube.



                    I think it would be the other way around. Malignaggi is the more intelligent fighter and would make more adjustments.
                    yea a lot of people disagree on a lot of fights, look at canelo/trout. everyone was split 50/50.have no rematch and that fight will this isnt even that. just because a few fringe fans on a boxing forum think paulie won doesnt mean there needs to be another fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP