Why did Mayweather do himself no favours? Because the fight would've been completely different if he'd made weight? I think it was more because he was totally unprofessional with a contractual agreement.
You say it's apples to oranges, and I'm talking about situations where people have a problem with fairness rather than the effects weight conditions have on fights. Was what Mayweather did fair? Not at all. Did it make a huge difference? Not at all. Same can be said for Cotto vs Pacquiao and you know that but just don't want to say it.
Marquez was still more of a lightwelter even in fight 4 and Pacquiao just couldn't make a 4lbs advantage (the same Mayweather had) work in his favour. And Marquez would be more of a threat to Pacquiao than to Mayweather now too. Why? Because of weight? Or experience?
What I'm getting at, is that the term "legitimate" threat can be pretty subjective due to circumstance and changes so much with hindsight. Also, the fact that consistant top level fighters in most divisions being considered a non-threat says more about the fighter in question.
You say it's apples to oranges, and I'm talking about situations where people have a problem with fairness rather than the effects weight conditions have on fights. Was what Mayweather did fair? Not at all. Did it make a huge difference? Not at all. Same can be said for Cotto vs Pacquiao and you know that but just don't want to say it.
Marquez was still more of a lightwelter even in fight 4 and Pacquiao just couldn't make a 4lbs advantage (the same Mayweather had) work in his favour. And Marquez would be more of a threat to Pacquiao than to Mayweather now too. Why? Because of weight? Or experience?
What I'm getting at, is that the term "legitimate" threat can be pretty subjective due to circumstance and changes so much with hindsight. Also, the fact that consistant top level fighters in most divisions being considered a non-threat says more about the fighter in question.
Comment