And that's why the scoring was extremely close to 50/50 on all ringside scorers? Maybe if Marquez didn't coast the last few rounds he may have got the decision, but as it stands the 3 fights are all competitive, close fights, stop being ignorant and ignoring the obvious signs.
So because some ringside scorers have it close, does it really mean that they are ALWAYS correct? For example, do you think Donaire vs Rigondeaux was a close fight to, because some ringside scorers had it that way? And BTW i did say the THIRD fight. The first two fights can we talk about after you do a RBR on Pacquiao vs Marquez III
To those who thougt Pacquiao won the third fight. Could you do a RBR and give me a explanation how Pac won the fight? I would really like to see that because it seems like we havn't seen the same fights.
/greeh
If 56 have it for Marquez and 51 Pac and the rest a draw then it's pretty clear it's a damn close fight. Nobody calls that **** a robbery except butthurt Marquez fans who cry robbery on ever Pacquaio fight.
So because some ringside scorers have it close, does it really mean that they are ALWAYS correct? For example, do you think Donaire vs Rigondeaux was a close fight to, because some ringside scorers had it that way? And BTW i did say the THIRD fight. The first two fights can we talk about after you do a RBR on Pacquiao vs Marquez III
/greeh
I notice you say 'some ringside' and not 50% like we're talking about with Pac vs Marquez. I'm not going to do a round by round analysis, it doesn't mean **** and is literally a waste of time. The burden of proof falls onto you and not me. There are plenty of RBR analysis on YouTube, creating more is pointless.
I notice you say 'some ringside' and not 50% like we're talking about with Pac vs Marquez. I'm not going to do a round by round analysis, it doesn't mean **** and is literally a waste of time. The burden of proof falls onto you and not me.
Whats your point? I wrote the word SOME because i didn't find a better word. The third fight was BS, you know it to. And what are your proofs? That some fat ass Dan Rafael (for example) thought it was close? I know this ain't topic, but did you have Donaire vs Rigondeaux close also? Because ringsiders thougt it was. I think DR scored it 114-113 for Rigo (and he wasn't the only one that had it close by ringsiders).
I notice you say 'some ringside' and not 50% like we're talking about with Pac vs Marquez. I'm not going to do a round by round analysis, it doesn't mean **** and is literally a waste of time. The burden of proof falls onto you and not me. There are plenty of RBR analysis on YouTube, creating more is pointless.
You can just write it up here, i don't demand you to create and edit a video.
Whats your point? I wrote the word SOME because i didn't find a better word. The third fight was BS, you know it to. And what are your proofs? That some fat ass Dan Rafael (for example) thought it was close? I know this ain't topic maybe, but did you have Donaire vs Rigondeaux close also? Because ringsiders thougt it was. I think DR scored it 114-113 for Rigo.
/greeh
The third fight wasn't BS, and saying 'you know it too' is not going to sway my opinion. My opinion (proof is a pointless term) is that it was a close fight, Pacquaio won, but if Marquez didn't coast the last few rounds (apparently because of what his corner said) he could have possibly pulled the victory. I'm not basing what I say off Fat Dan, so dunno where that came from. I didn't think Donaire vs Rig was close, but unless you can show me a 50/50 split of people saying it was and wasn't I'm going to assume most, besides a select few didn't either.
The third fight wasn't BS, and saying 'you know it too' is not going to sway my opinion. My opinion (proof is a pointless term) is that it was a close fight, Pacquaio won, but if Marquez didn't coast the last few rounds (apparently because of what his corner said) he could have possibly pulled the victory. I'm not basing what I say off Fat Dan, so dunno where that came from. I didn't think Donaire vs Rig was close, but unless you can show me a 50/50 split of people saying it was and wasn't I'm going to assume most, besides a select few didn't either.
I'm not doing a RBR, I explained why earlier.
OK. I only picked Dan Rafael as a example. And Donaire vs Rigondeaux wasn't 50/50 by scorers, but i was just trying to make a point that ringsiders aren't faultless. You are always free to have your opinion, and it's much funnier to discuss when people don't agree. But i don't like when people earlier in the thread is so biased (*******s, or whatever they are called) and are talking like Marquez got lucky, that Pac was old, lucky punch, he was on roids etc, when he knocked him out. (look at the thread starters first post for example). Sure, i can admit that im a huge JMM fan, but i try not to sound/seem biased. But even how much i try i can't see Pacquiao being even close to win the third fight. The first and second fight, sure i agree it's close.
Marquez said time after time, that he wasn't going to let the judges decide the winner. He said many times either I win by KO or I KO him, this time around Marquez wasn't concerned with winning round by round.
marquez said the exact same thing going into the 3rd
and he fought in the 4th the exact same way he fought in the 3rd
He was a bit dissapointing against Bradley but we all know he really won that fight. And he was whooping that roided Marquez before the KO. Manny knows he juiced that's why they're putting in place more stringent testing.... If Marquez dared to face Manny natural he'll get his ass whooped and he knows it.
Nuthugger logic. Also highly hypocritical to insinuate Marquez wasn't clean whe he took the tests, something Pac was so reluctant to do to secure the big payday against Mayweather...
Comment