Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hopkins vs. Kovalev Mandatory is Ordered By The IBF

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Arsene Knows View Post
    Doesn't a unification take precedent over a mandatory? You would think Hopkins will fight Stevenson next. Maybe even drop the title if he has to.
    Problems with HBO and Showtime apparently.

    I'd personally rather this fight to be honest.

    Comment


    • #12
      I love the Executioner...even in his most boring fight, I've never uneasy.

      That being said, this is the first time I've actually been worried about one of his fights....Crusher is going to HURT this man badly.

      Workrate, combos, power, footwork. Dangerous fight for the Executioner.


      The Executioner should just give up his belt, at this point in his career...he has earned the right to duck (pick & choose) who he wants to fight. He should consider his legacy.

      Comment


      • #13
        BHop doesnt get a voluntary defense like certain people?

        Not saying BHop cant win but dangerous fight cause Kov is a decent boxer himself. Not just a puncher.


        Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
          BHop doesnt get a voluntary defense like certain people?

          Not saying BHop cant win but dangerous fight cause Kov is a decent boxer himself. Not just a puncher.


          Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
          IBF are pretty strict on mandatories by the looks of things.

          Comment


          • #15
            Mandatory's & #1's ALWAYS have prcedence & hopknks gets no vlntary as he he on the title he was'nt #1 in ibf...let's c the old, dirt, head2st cherry picker evade this or go vs a limited. but strong Stevenson...hopkins would've been crushes by Carlos Monzon, even @ '75 by V. Galendez...won't even bring M Spinks in2 this...

            Comment


            • #16
              If Hopkins takes this fight it might be his last.

              Comment


              • #17
                everything said in this thread has been said before...there's nothing new under the sun....B.Hop will NOT get stopped and he will NOT be beat by this dude...period!!!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by nycsmooth View Post
                  Mandatory's & #1's ALWAYS have prcedence & hopknks gets no vlntary as he he on the title he was'nt #1 in ibf...let's c the old, dirt, head2st cherry picker evade this or go vs a limited. but strong Stevenson...hopkins would've been crushes by Carlos Monzon, even @ '75 by V. Galendez...won't even bring M Spinks in2 this...
                  Why do you type like a ******? Are you literally mentally impaired or do you have a broken keyboard?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Mr. Philadel View Post
                    everything said in this thread has been said before...there's nothing new under the sun....B.Hop will NOT get stopped and he will NOT be beat by this dude...period!!!
                    Will he fight him next though? that is the question.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      I'd love it, but Hopkins is WAY past the point where I care that much who he fights. It's hard to fault a 50 year old for fighting anyone.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP