Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ring Magazine still not put froch on the P4P list

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by nÔÔb_out_king View Post
    I don't see any one on that list, that Froch would beat if he weighed the same as them. Not even Bradley, who as well imo do not belong there
    I actually think Froch has more than what he showed the first time around with Ward he looked stiff im not saying he beats Ward but if he lets he's hands go it would make for an entertaining fight, and there are at least 3 guys there in that bull**** list i would knock off but by means of who id replace in it with Froch if it had to be one it would be Broner without a doubt.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by AgainstTheRopes View Post
      Their rankings are sketchy but the champions are legit and the belt still holds weight.

      Rigondeaux, Mayweather, Canelo, Garcia, Ward, Martinez, Dawson, and Wlad.
      Nope it certainly does not.

      Comment


      • #53
        He's the wrong skin colour.

        Comment


        • #54
          ring magazine's p4p top ten list is a JOKE...i don't know why anyone still cares about it...people should have given up on it after broner was added to the top 5, and then they added guerrero..and now they have canelo AND broner lmao..espn's top ten p4p list is FAR better.
          Last edited by Bermuda; 05-29-2013, 09:41 AM.

          Comment


          • #55
            not even a top 20. no way.

            Comment


            • #56
              I don't know why people are so obsessed with rings rating. They have broner cAnelo and once had guererro in top 10. Stop getting so upset withy heir shhhit ratings

              Comment


              • #57
                Froch and his fans say ward is boring...I.e. please dont use defense versus froch, please let froch hit you cleanly in the face mr ward. That's what they are really saying. Lol

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                  I don't know why people are so obsessed with rings rating. They have broner cAnelo and once had guererro in top 10. Stop getting so upset withy heir shhhit ratings
                  Broner is about to be a 3 division champ at age 23. He must be doing something right. 3 divisions is the definition of a p4p. I have no problem with him there.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Simply pathetic.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by MRCHOKEaMF View Post
                      Broner is about to be a 3 division champ at age 23. He must be doing something right. 3 divisions is the definition of a p4p. I have no problem with him there.
                      Broner's title at 147 will be as paper as it gets

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP