First slap was Having Broner and Mares there but Not Rigondeaux and we took it now they're just pissing on us without even trying to make it seem like rain.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ring Magazine still not put froch on the P4P list
Collapse
-
-
Froch is good but not top 10 in the sport. Andre made him look like an amateur and he will beat him up even worse in the rematch. People need to stop overreacting to a win over a mediocre Kessler.
Comment
-
You know something is wrong with Boxing if Broner is on the damn list. Dude hasn't really fought anyone yet. Hes still in the early stages of his career so wtf... He has a lot of skills and potential but come on. Rigo deserves to be on there a lot more then Broner. He just outclassed a high quality name.
Comment
-
The Ring's P4P is an embarrassment. It's not just who's in it but who isn't. Strongly agreed Froch should be on that list. I won't even get into the Broner, Mares, Alvarez crap... I swore awhile back I would never buy The Ring again and I've kept my promise. I used to buy it monthly. For years. Never anymore. Ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostStay pissed you degenerate.
Originally posted by thuggery View PostI am in agreement with your post. Ring Magazine is a steaming pile of dung
Originally posted by yoz View PostPretty sure Ducketts has issues with white fighters...
Froch, the warrior > the Ring's P4P list. The Ring are a joke now, anyway.
Originally posted by Sweet Pea 50 View PostAfter seeing the post you made in that thread that just got deleted, I'd say don't throw stones in glass houses.
Originally posted by thuggery View PostAll he does is trash fighters who aren't black. Dude has some issues.
Comment
-
-
Golden Boy magazine has been skewed for years.
This is the best:
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=pound
Comment
-
The last straw for me was when they ranked Broner #5. I know it's not just accomplishment and you have to take talent into account but come on now, 5? After beating one elite fighter who was solid but not great by any means? It's a joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Light_Speed View PostThe last straw for me was when they ranked Broner #5. I know it's not just accomplishment and you have to take talent into account but come on now, 5? After beating one elite fighter who was solid but not great by any means? It's a joke.
Exactly.
I think Broner is a top 10 talent.
But does he have a resume, or even one win that catapults him in the discussion at this time?
No. Not in my eyes, he doesn't. But that is just my opinion. And you know how the saying goes.
"Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one, and they usually stink."
Comment
Comment