So now, Canelo "barely" beat Trout? He exposed a fighter that beat Cotto. Floyd's best win in years.
Exposed? lmao If anything the judges got exposed, no way that fight was a landslide. If anything Canelo's workrate & cardio was exposed. I give Canelo alot of credit for this win as I had him winning by a round but hardly an exposure.
if a guy has a high work rate," big deal. throwing tons of punches means nothing".
now you're crying about his work rate not being high enough.
If your stance is "Floyd fought the top fighter", why is OK in your eyes that Floyd never fought Margarito, Williams or Cotto when they were the top fighters at 147?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
The funny thing is, Floyd fans were saying, "let's wait til after the Canelo/Trout fight, and then talk about the fight."
Fight happened, Canelo won, and now it's, "Canelo's too big!" "Floyd should stay away from 154."
I have no idea why people are fixated on this fight because it's not going to be an action packed fight it's going be a tactical slow paced boxing match which is considered boring to most boxing fans
If your stance is "Floyd fought the top fighter", why is OK in your eyes that Floyd never fought Margarito, Williams or Cotto when they were the top fighters at 147?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Im a bigger fan of Williams & Cotto then Floyd. You need to do your research and stop stereotyping because I'm not nutthugging your man.
Go watch the fight again like I did. It wasn't a landslide like the one judge had it, but Canelo clearly won.
Trout got exposed in that fight. The guy was jab spamming, and couldn't hit Canelo for nothing. Canelo also showed great upper body movement, and boxing skills. Ok, so he didn't have a high workrate, and he got tired after getting straight punches to his body all night by Trout. Oh no, he got exposed!!!
Things like not being able to throw a million punches, and getting tired happens when you're not facing an opponent that's tailor made for you.
Well yeah, but your acting like it was a Margarito or Cotto vs Pac type of beatdown when it wasn't.
All I meant is that it was a close fight and Canelo had just as many flaws as Trout. I was super impressed by his athleticism & defense but come on, Trout did not get exposed. It was the #2 & 3 154ers having a good hard fought title unification. You can't trash Trout for the heart he showed.
If your stance is "Floyd fought the top fighter", why is OK in your eyes that Floyd never fought Margarito, Williams or Cotto when they were the top fighters at 147?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
we know why the margarito fight didnt happen its been posted time and again that arum laid no blame on floyd for that fight not happening
please give me a time frame that floyd could have fought paul? really look back at those brief months. oh and when was he a draw?
Again, discussed on this board time and again. 140 cotto and his team aint want it. 147 I would have LOVED to see it. Arum and floyd dont do business and AGAIN according to cotto himself, he never pursued a floyd fight.
Just because fights didnt happen does not mean that floyd is automatic duck. Yall throw that word around to easy. Ask fighters why they aint wanna fight floyd
did everyone know canelos ring weight before the trout fight? cause i didnt, and 20 pounds is too much
This is what I mean. Floyd fans knew how much bigger Canelo would be before the Trout fight, but after actually seeing Canelo beat a top boxer, things changed drastically.
You guys act like you just found out Canelo is a JMW.
Comment