RING current Top 10 P4P

[El Angel]

1 Floyd Mayweather USA 44-0-0 (26) Welterweight
2 Andre Ward * USA 26-0-0 (14) Super Middleweight
3 Juan Manuel Marquez MEX 55-6-1 (40) Welterweight
4 Sergio Martinez * ARG 51-2-2 (28) Middleweight
5 Manny Pacquiao PHI 54-5-2 (38) Welterweight
6 Wladimir Klitschko UKR 60-3-0 (51) Heavyweight
7 Abner Mares MEX 26-0-1 (14) Junior Featherweight
8 Carl Froch ENG 30-2-0 (22) Super Middleweight
9 Guillermo Rigondeaux * CUB 12-0-0 (8) Junior Featherweight
10 Nonito Donaire PHI 31-2-0 (20) Junior Featherweight

These are actually good rankings right here.

http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/

[Roy Hobbs]

how in the world is adrien broner in the top 10 but rigondeaux who just beat a top 5 p4p fighter in donaire not even there? This is a shameful list and one has to start thinking is GBP influencing this list to not have a Top Rank fighter?

[JOM'S]

And people wonder why so many cats think boxing is f**king ******ed and deserves to be a fringe sport. Fighters like Broner can fight a parade of bums -- with a career defining victory over ANTONIO DEMARCO and he's the #6 P4P in the world? Are you f**king serious?!?! Disgraceful. And this from a publication that masks itself as respectable in the sport.

IMHO RING Mag was once a respectable publication, now it is just another tool...

[low_Bo]

1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. Wlad
5. Mares
6. Broner
7. Martinez
8. Pacquiao
9. Bradley
10. Alvarez

Broner shouldn't be on obviously, Rigondeaux should be there. But they finally have Mares in which is right, and I wouldn't have such a terrible problem with Alvarez there, because Trout was a big win, but how is Rigondeaux not there???

Bradley shouldn't be I the top 20. His only decent win was a total sham, a robbery. He almost got ko'd by that Russian bum too.

[4Corners]

Bradley shouldn't be I the top 20. His only decent win was a total sham, a robbery. He almost got ko'd by that Russian bum too.

Bradley does have wins over Witter, Peterson, Alexander, Abregu, Holt too though, which were either good at the time or better since.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

There shouldn't be a rush in adding Broner to that list yet. He'll be there soon enough and everyone will agree when that happens. I like the top 3, but after that, its all wrong. Rigo should be on there.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

1 Floyd Mayweather USA 44-0-0 (26) Welterweight
2 Andre Ward * USA 26-0-0 (14) Super Middleweight
3 Juan Manuel Marquez MEX 55-6-1 (40) Welterweight
4 Sergio Martinez * ARG 51-2-2 (28) Middleweight
5 Manny Pacquiao PHI 54-5-2 (38) Welterweight
6 Wladimir Klitschko UKR 60-3-0 (51) Heavyweight
7 Abner Mares MEX 26-0-1 (14) Junior Featherweight
8 Carl Froch ENG 30-2-0 (22) Super Middleweight
9 Guillermo Rigondeaux * CUB 12-0-0 (8) Junior Featherweight
10 Nonito Donaire PHI 31-2-0 (20) Junior Featherweight

These are actually good rankings right here.

http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/

That's a lot better.

[Mike D]

IMHO RING Mag was once a respectable publication, now it is just another tool...

Agreed. It's garbage. You need to have a resume...being considered a top 10 P4P fighter on the planet should be a sacred thing, and I don't care how mythical these rankings are. It's like the AP top 25 polls in college football and college basketball. It's prestigious to be on them.

Yet they have a guy on the list that has an absolute laughable resume. I'm not saying that one day Broner won't be a top 10 P4P boxer -- **** one day he may even be in the argument for the top spot. Who knows. But right now all I know is, his resume is a punchline. He shouldn't even be in the top f**king 25. I'm serious. These lists aren't about potential, it's about what you've ALREADY done.

[low_Bo]

Bradley does have wins over Witter, Peterson, Alexander, Abregu, Holt too though, which were either good at the time or better since.

None of them are top quality fighters. More like espn type fighters.

[HanzGruber]

Surprised the took Guerrero off of it lol. Broner and cAnelo have no business up there. Ring is obviously a joke now but not having Rigo is just plain ******