RING current Top 10 P4P

[El Angel]

1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. Wlad
5. Mares
6. Broner
7. Martinez
8. Pacquiao
9. Bradley
10. Alvarez

Broner shouldn't be on obviously, Rigondeaux should be there. But they finally have Mares in which is right, and I wouldn't have such a terrible problem with Alvarez there, because Trout was a big win, but how is Rigondeaux not there???

No disrepect to Mares, but he shouldn't be above Martinez. Rigondeaux should be on there too. Bradley off. Alvarez? One win over Trout doesn't make you P4P. OFF. Broner? Off. What a garbage list, but it's the RING, they have no credibility anymore.

[FeFist]

A disgraceful pound for pound list. Don't understand how they can overlook a unified champ who schooled a top 3 pound for pound fighter, yet place Broner and Alvarez on the list.

Ring pound for pound list is going the way of compubox analysis. Misleading those who do not know any better.

[4Corners]

No disrepect to Mares, but he shouldn't be above Martinez. Rigondeaux should be on there too. Bradley off. Alvarez? One win over Trout doesn't make you P4P. OFF. Broner? Off. What a garbage list, but it's the RING, they have no credibility anymore.

Mares a little high I guess, but Sergio hasn't really done much lately. Since his 2010 wins, he's gotten wins over Macklin, Chavez, Barker, Dzinziruk, and arguably lost to Murray.

Since then Mares has beaten Agbeko, Moreno, and Ponce which were all good wins, and fights people thought he'd lose.

[Mike D]

Rigo should be probably be there in place of Broner, with Broner off the list completely. I think Mares is a little high, but he deserves to be in the top 10. I also am a tad surprised that Donaire fell off the list completely...personally I still think P4P he's a better fighter than Bradley. Bradley on the list, especially with his last two performances, is a joke to a degree. But f**k it Donaire did get schooled by a fighter (albeit a damn good one) with only 12 pro bouts.

Other than that I'm okay with the list.

[mex602]

broner???????


put rigo in there

[AvoidDisaster]

Take Broner and Canelo out, put in Froch and Rigondeaux.

[El Angel]

Mares a little high I guess, but Sergio hasn't really done much lately. Since his 2010 wins, he's gotten wins over Macklin, Chavez, Barker, Dzinziruk, and arguably lost to Murray.

Since then Mares has beaten Agbeko, Moreno, and Ponce which were all good wins, and fights people thought he'd lose.

True, but his form didn't appear to slip until his last fight vs Murray. I hope Martinez fights GGG next year, to silence all the doubters that he's ducking. If he can recover from his injuries, he can beat him.

Mares should be at like 6 or 7, but he should've been on there a few fights ago, not sure what took him so long to get on there.

[Mike D]

broner???????


put rigo in there

And people wonder why so many cats think boxing is f**king ******ed and deserves to be a fringe sport. Fighters like Broner can fight a parade of bums -- with a career defining victory over ANTONIO DEMARCO and he's the #6 P4P in the world? Are you f**king serious?!?! Disgraceful. And this from a publication that masks itself as respectable in the sport.

[JOM'S]

I'm glad Wlad and Mares got their due, but Wlad should be above Ward. I feel that Marquez should easily be #2.

Broner being on there is a joke, but that's expected.

I agree that Marquez should easily be No. 2, as it is IMHO JuanMa is still being underrated ....

[low_Bo]

I'm glad Wlad and Mares got their due, but Wlad should be above Ward. I feel that Marquez should easily be #2.

Broner being on there is a joke, but that's expected.

Marquez gets too much credit. Yes, he dethroned p4p king PAC, but he was losing the fight before the counter punch that closed the show. What other great win does he have in the last few years? A win over PAC is huge, but to put him in the top three is giving him way too much credit for one victory. It's not like he was dominating PAC before the KO. Don't forget Mayweather dominated his azz even more than he did molasses Guerrero.