RING current Top 10 P4P

[humanpunchingbg]

1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. Wlad
5. Martinez
6. Mares
7. Bradley
8. Alvarez
9. Pacquiao
10. Broner

[4Corners]

None of them are top quality fighters. More like espn type fighters.

.............Really???

Witter, Holt, and Devon were all top ranked JWW's. Abregu looked pretty good against Dulorme, and Peterson beat Khan.

[Nagabilly]

I feel Rigo, Froch, and even Nonito deserve to be on that list more than Broner.

[Hougigo]

P4p list is a joke

[285Kid]

Last 10 fights: Andrien Broner & Saul Alvarez vs Carl Froch

[iLovesoccermoms]

funny seeing pacquiao down at #8

[flat1985]

Take Broner and Canelo out, put in Froch and Rigondeaux.

This really

[Pocket Dogs!]

For all the people bitching about Broner being on the list (and those criticisms are justified), remember that the Ring had Robert Guerrero of all people ranked at #8 on the list last time. Take out Broner and Canelo and replace with Rigondeaux and Donaire.

[Mike Tyson77]

Can anyone take Wlads 5 belts???????????nope. He's #1.

[hugh grant]

I dont see how Sergio can be above Pac after almost losiing to Martin Murray who probably isnt in the top 40 p4p fighters, and Sergio had home advantage and probably got a favourable home town decision it could have been a draw otherwise.

Pac fights top 5 p4ps in JMM and top 10 in bradley, gets blatantly robbed against bradley and gets penalized. If you dare fight top notch fighters you can lose and shouldnt be penalized. As for Broner being above Pac, lol. There is obviously no logic to Ring magazine top 10 choice, so therefore Pac is still no1 and i dont have to justify that, as Ring Magazine obviously dont.

Floyd shouldnt be no1 as he fights slow flat footed cherry picks and hasnt beaten any top 10 guy p4p fighters. Last one was supposedly SSM but we know in hindsight he wasnt a top 10 p4p fighter.