Why do so many people still buy PPV fights? It's 2013, not 1993

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Southpawology
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 12547
    • 1,609
    • 1,216
    • 88,940

    #21
    Originally posted by thesenuts
    Everyone these days has a computer/laptop with a high speed internet connection. It's extremely easy to stream any live feed for FREE. I don't understand why people are paying $50-$60 for a PPV fight when google is your best friend.


    Anyone have an explanation for this?
    Because if you support the sport and the fight you should buy it instead of mooching off streams. I can understand streaming a fight in a foreign country thats not on tv though, but if you support boxing you should buy the PPV.

    Comment

    • BUNGALOWS
      undisputed champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 6331
      • 326
      • 154
      • 7,018

      #22
      Originally posted by Dr Rumack
      PPVs are bad for the sport. As Ross Greenburg himself said:

      "I can't tell you that pay-per-view helps the sport because it doesn't. It hurts the sport because it narrows our audience, but it's a fact of life. Every time we try to make an HBO World Championship Boxing fight, we're up against mythical pay-per-view numbers.

      HBO doesn't make a lot of money from pay-per-view. There's usually a cap on what we can make. But the promoters and fighters insist on pay-per-view because that's where their greatest profits lie."

      PPVs hurt boxing because they mean less people are going to see the best fighters in the sport. For a sport that already has limited exposure, it limits it even more. When you buy a PPV you're not helping boxing, you're making Schaefer/Oscar/Arum and Manny/Floyd that little bit richer.
      Good point. I meant for mega fights though. I agree, anything less than a mega fight should be on HBO/ESPN/FOX or another national station.

      Comment

      • Bushbaby
        Wild Apache
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 23513
        • 727
        • 370
        • 32,078

        #23
        I agree. I'm a proud streamer right now. I ain't buying $h!t.

        Comment

        • Sweet Pea 50
          Predator....
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2006
          • 34572
          • 2,336
          • 2,403
          • 81,317

          #24
          Meh, I could make the excuse that Comcast is already getting me for over $200 a month.

          Comment

          • PeterinMI
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 658
            • 31
            • 88
            • 7,427

            #25
            Originally posted by thesenuts
            Everyone these days has a computer/laptop with a high speed internet connection. It's extremely easy to stream any live feed for FREE. I don't understand why people are paying $50-$60 for a PPV fight when google is your best friend.


            Anyone have an explanation for this?
            I go to the theater to watch the big fights like Mayweather bouts. Next best thing to being at the fight and the prices are better than PPV.

            Comment

            • COYG
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 163
              • 15
              • 11
              • 6,649

              #26
              Originally posted by BUNGALOWS
              Good point. I meant for mega fights though. I agree, anything less than a mega fight should be on HBO/ESPN/FOX or another national station.
              But is not that part of the problem, you limit the audience for the biggest fights, how is that supposed to increase the interest in boxing.

              For instance if the Superbowl were to be on PPV would that not do damage to that sport?

              Comment

              • Grimmer
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 4270
                • 299
                • 354
                • 10,636

                #27
                'Cause I got a job and am not a cheapskate lol

                Comment

                • CityByTheBay
                  Up and Comer
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 74
                  • 7
                  • 0
                  • 6,324

                  #28
                  because I'm able to afford it.

                  Comment

                  • BUNGALOWS
                    undisputed champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 6331
                    • 326
                    • 154
                    • 7,018

                    #29
                    Originally posted by COYG
                    But is not that part of the problem, you limit the audience for the biggest fights, how is that supposed to increase the interest in boxing.

                    For instance if the Superbowl were to be on PPV would that not do damage to that sport?
                    That's true. It's combat sports, so what can you do?

                    Comment

                    • BostonGuy
                      Emeritus Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 13343
                      • 2,119
                      • 6,833
                      • 900,690,265

                      #30
                      Sometimes it's nice to make the fight "an event" like the supah bowl. You show the fight on a nice plasma flat screen with surround sound and you sit comfortably on your couch, instead of hunched over a tiny computer screen watching a ****ty chopping internet stream and switching back and forth from the fight to boxingscene...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP