Why do so many people still buy PPV fights? It's 2013, not 1993
Collapse
-
-
PPVs are bad for the sport. As Ross Greenburg himself said:
"I can't tell you that pay-per-view helps the sport because it doesn't. It hurts the sport because it narrows our audience, but it's a fact of life. Every time we try to make an HBO World Championship Boxing fight, we're up against mythical pay-per-view numbers.
HBO doesn't make a lot of money from pay-per-view. There's usually a cap on what we can make. But the promoters and fighters insist on pay-per-view because that's where their greatest profits lie."
PPVs hurt boxing because they mean less people are going to see the best fighters in the sport. For a sport that already has limited exposure, it limits it even more. When you buy a PPV you're not helping boxing, you're making Schaefer/Oscar/Arum and Manny/Floyd that little bit richer.Comment
-
-
Everyone these days has a computer/laptop with a high speed internet connection. It's extremely easy to stream any live feed for FREE. I don't understand why people are paying $50-$60 for a PPV fight when google is your best friend.
Anyone have an explanation for this?Comment
-
For instance if the Superbowl were to be on PPV would that not do damage to that sport?Comment
-
-
That's true. It's combat sports, so what can you do?Comment
-
Sometimes it's nice to make the fight "an event" like the supah bowl. You show the fight on a nice plasma flat screen with surround sound and you sit comfortably on your couch, instead of hunched over a tiny computer screen watching a ****ty chopping internet stream and switching back and forth from the fight to boxingscene...Comment
Comment