If Pac wanted to fight someone coming off a L....
Collapse
-
Bradley's an easier comeback opponent than Cotto at '54, it would have been a good test since he doesn't punch hard.
Like Cotto, Marquez would also be a tough comeback fight (well the new Marquez with one-punch power anyway).Comment
-
Comment
-
Hell no, bogus belt as bogus can be. hardly any Pac fans pretend otherwise. On the other hand, a lot of Floyd fans will crow about him being 2x champ at 154, beat #1 SWW at his best weight etc. But when it's time to fight a natural, near prime SWW, Floyd is too small, it's not fair, double standards, etc.Comment
-
I think Arum views Cotto as a guy who left him for the prettier, younger chic across the street...he got the stench of Mayweather and De La Hoya, Arum isn't doing any business anymore w/ CottoComment
-
cool story bro.....i see plenty of pac fans boasting and listing pac's "8 division world champion" in their sigs. it's a two way street buddy.Hell no, bogus belt as bogus can be. hardly any Pac fans pretend otherwise. On the other hand, a lot of Floyd fans will crow about him being 2x champ at 154, beat #1 SWW at his best weight etc. But when it's time to fight a natural, near prime SWW, Floyd is too small, it's not fair, double standards, etc.Comment
-
I don't think he carried a grudge immediately, he really wanted that Pac rematch cause he knows good business. He may have developed one sinceComment
-
already fought cotto tho the fight makes sense honestlyComment
-
cotto isn't a golden boy fighter.....he can do what he wants. and even if he was, pac don't get a pass for not fighting gbp fighters cause all that "gbp/al haymon-top rank fued" talk goes out of the window as an excuse when it comes to floyd......i'm holding pac to the same standard.Comment
-
Ok can't speak for all Pac fans. From what I can tell, it's understood that belt is garbage. But Pac was honest about it, he tried and realized he can't handle that 8th division, dropped the belt on the spot. No pretense, no sitting on the belt with no intention of defendingComment
Comment