Is Manuel Charr a satisfactory opponent for David Haye?

[The Hammer]

Charr is a decent opponent

Amazing how Charr has gone from being a BUM before he fought Vitali to a "decent opponent" for Haye after Manuel's TKO loss to Vitali.

[LacedUp]

Charr was bad against Vitali, and will probably be KOd quicker against Haye. He's not worthy of either shot. But Haye is not a titleholder and who else was realistically out there to fight?

[Jack Napier]

sure he is
anybody but the Klits is satisfactory for Haye
that punk revoked his right for title shots in the Wlad "fight"
he can fight anybody else and it's just fine
but Haye never deserves to get another title match, fuck him

[yoz]

Where did this myth come from that Charr gave a heavily faded Vitali a tough fight? The guy got his ass kicked. He lost every round, got dropped, busted up and got stopped in 4 one-sided rounds.

He only started to fight once it was stopped lol

This ^^^^^^.

LOL at some of the comments on here

[yoz]

It really was one-sided.

Haye will land at will, just like Vitali.

[Dolor]

agreed. if charr is lucky he will lose by TKO due to cuts again. if he is unlucky, he will get brutally KOed.

It really was one-sided.

Haye will land at will, just like Vitali.

[The Hammer]

David Haye thought Manuel Charr was a "terrible" opponent for Vitali:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/box...e-defence.html

David Haye has slammed Vitali Klitschko's 'terrible' defence of his world heavyweight title on Saturday and claimed the Ukrainian wouldn't last six rounds with him.

[bravestone]

Haye is an utter scumbag. This is your comeback fight? Then he'll of course yap about the Klitschkos ducking him yada yada when really he ducked them about 5 times to 0. Go away David.

[LacedUp]

Haye is an utter scumbag. This is your comeback fight? Then he'll of course yap about the Klitschkos ducking him yada yada when really he ducked them about 5 times to 0. Go away David.

Who would you have liked him to face?

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I think its an easy fight for Haye.