Is Manuel Charr a satisfactory opponent for David Haye?
Collapse
-
-
So Charr has turned from worthy of a title challenge to a bum based on a fight lost on cuts? and it's not even like he's fighting a champion, just another contender. That doesn't make any sense to me. Thompson was mandatory, which is fair enough. Equals Haye's Ruiz fight.
What about Wach? Who did he beat to challenge for the biggest prize in all of sports? The mighty McBride? Being unbeaten does not mean worthy of a title challenge. Anybody who claims otherwise, doesn't know SHIAT about boxing.
Just to be clear, he is not a good enough opponent for Haye. And he was certainly not good enough for Vitali.Last edited by LacedUp; 05-02-2013, 08:50 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
You think Vitali is now faded enough for Haye to beat him?
I think it would be a competitive fight now that Vitali is faded. When Haye ducked out of the fight with then-age 39 Vitali, it wouldn't have been competitive (easy win for Vitali).Comment
-
This is NOT an easy fight for David Haye. Haye's best heavyweight win is Valuev and Chisora who lost his last 4/5 fights. Manuel Charr is big heavyweight and I don't think Haye will walk through him. He might get tested here and he might be forced to dig deep.Comment
-
Comment
-
Charr is a poor mans Chisora.Comment

Comment