Is Manuel Charr a satisfactory opponent for David Haye?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roy Jones Jnr
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 5123
    • 253
    • 276
    • 23,034

    #51
    Originally posted by 4Corners
    I keep it real. Charr was s**t for Vitali, and he's s**t for Haye.

    Charr would be a suitable opponent for someone like Malik Scott or Bryant Jennings, someone coming up.


    And how long does Malik Scott plan on spending ''coming up'' ?

    Comment

    • LacedUp
      Still Smokin'
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 29171
      • 781
      • 381
      • 132,163

      #52
      Originally posted by Weltschmerz
      Mormeck wasn't justified, I'll give you that. Charr, Wach and Pianeta were all undefeated and justified. When Povetkin doesn't step up to the plate, Wlad still has to stay active, and we as fans should be grateful that the champ wants to stay busy.
      So Charr has turned from worthy of a title challenge to a bum based on a fight lost on cuts? and it's not even like he's fighting a champion, just another contender. That doesn't make any sense to me. Thompson was mandatory, which is fair enough. Equals Haye's Ruiz fight.

      What about Wach? Who did he beat to challenge for the biggest prize in all of sports? The mighty McBride? Being unbeaten does not mean worthy of a title challenge. Anybody who claims otherwise, doesn't know SHIAT about boxing.

      Just to be clear, he is not a good enough opponent for Haye. And he was certainly not good enough for Vitali.
      Last edited by LacedUp; 05-02-2013, 08:50 AM.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #53
        Originally posted by Roy Jones Jnr
        Regarding your question, well it's a bit of **** fight tbh, but as long we get Haye - Vitali i don't really care.
        You feel that Haye can beat age 42 Vitali?

        Vitali will retire after the Stiverne fight.

        Comment

        • Roy Jones Jnr
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2011
          • 5123
          • 253
          • 276
          • 23,034

          #54
          Originally posted by Freedom.
          You feel that Haye can beat age 42 Vitali?

          Vitali will retire after the Stiverne fight.
          It's one of a very few HW matchups i'm interested in.

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #55
            Originally posted by Roy Jones Jnr
            It's one of a very few HW matchups i'm interested in.
            You think Vitali is now faded enough for Haye to beat him?

            I think it would be a competitive fight now that Vitali is faded. When Haye ducked out of the fight with then-age 39 Vitali, it wouldn't have been competitive (easy win for Vitali).

            Comment

            • NoLove
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2011
              • 1262
              • 55
              • 56
              • 7,781

              #56
              This is NOT an easy fight for David Haye. Haye's best heavyweight win is Valuev and Chisora who lost his last 4/5 fights. Manuel Charr is big heavyweight and I don't think Haye will walk through him. He might get tested here and he might be forced to dig deep.

              Comment

              • LacedUp
                Still Smokin'
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 29171
                • 781
                • 381
                • 132,163

                #57
                Originally posted by Freedom.
                You think Vitali is now faded enough for Haye to beat him?

                I think it would be a competitive fight now that Vitali is faded. When Haye ducked out of the fight with then-age 39 Vitali, it wouldn't have been competitive (easy win for Vitali).
                Lol at this post.

                Comment

                • LacedUp
                  Still Smokin'
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 29171
                  • 781
                  • 381
                  • 132,163

                  #58
                  Originally posted by NoLove
                  This is NOT an easy fight for David Haye. Haye's best heavyweight win is Valuev and Chisora who lost his last 4/5 fights. Manuel Charr is big heavyweight and I don't think Haye will walk through him. He might get tested here and he might be forced to dig deep.
                  Charr is a poor mans Chisora.

                  Comment

                  • NoLove
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 1262
                    • 55
                    • 56
                    • 7,781

                    #59
                    Originally posted by LacedUp
                    Charr is a poor mans Chisora.
                    Chirsora's best win is Sam Sexton. He has failed every time he stepped up.

                    Comment

                    • yoz
                      Yoz
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2011
                      • 8617
                      • 439
                      • 427
                      • 16,868

                      #60
                      Vitali > Haye, probably by KO. If Haye tried to trade with Vitali, he'd get caught with something big.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP