Mosley said that Cotto hit harder than Margarito but that didn't help Cotto in the first fight and he didn't stop Margarito in the rematch without the officials stopping it. Mosley had a close debated decision against Cotto (I felt Cotto did enough to win) but slaughtered Margarito. Doesn't matter how hard a fighter hits if he is not doing the significant damage it takes to put a beating on a fighter. Clearly Garcia put a bigger hurting on Zab then Matthysse did. Maybe Matthysse does hit harder but from the looks of both fights with Zab it is debatable but HEY!......
Zab would know better than us right? Matthysse is a good fighter but he is not dominant and against fighters who can take his punch, survive then he will go through close or debatable decisions more than he already has. He reminds me of Luis Collazo in a way. Good fighter but always falls short in the big fights whether from close decisions or robberies. Matthysse is with Golden Boy and Zab wasn't but the judges called it for Zab. Would think if Matthysse clearly won then the judges would give it to Golden Boy's guy. None of this matters because Peterson/Matthysse is coming up and this will show how good Matthysse really is because power don't mean much to Peterson because he's durable.
Zab would know better than us right? Matthysse is a good fighter but he is not dominant and against fighters who can take his punch, survive then he will go through close or debatable decisions more than he already has. He reminds me of Luis Collazo in a way. Good fighter but always falls short in the big fights whether from close decisions or robberies. Matthysse is with Golden Boy and Zab wasn't but the judges called it for Zab. Would think if Matthysse clearly won then the judges would give it to Golden Boy's guy. None of this matters because Peterson/Matthysse is coming up and this will show how good Matthysse really is because power don't mean much to Peterson because he's durable.
Comment