If Canelo does destroy Trout I can already see every hater using this very thread as an excuse to call trout a bum and continue to say that Canelo hstill hasn't fought anyone! mark my words it will happen.
I'm still trying to figure out how someone discerns that a fighter (is special), when he's done nothing nor beaten anyone of note ion the weight class he resides. Do these guys own a Delorian or something??
It's similar to when I watched Ray Leonard in the Olympics, before he even turned pro. I thought he was special. When I watched John Elway at Stanford, before he turned pro, I thought he was special. Alvarez has fought long enough to formulate an opinion of his skills. Yeah, I think he is special, even if the common knowledge is he hasn't beaten anyone of note.
But the time is coming up soon, that he will take a test and noone will be able to deny it, if he prevails and shows off doing it. Until then everybody can take their turn, saying what they think will happen.
It's similar to when I watched Ray Leonard in the Olympics, before he even turned pro. I thought he was special. When I watched John Elway at Stanford, before he turned pro, I thought he was special. Alvarez has fought long enough to formulate an opinion of his skills. Yeah, I think he is special, even if the common knowledge is he hasn't beaten anyone of note.
But the time is coming up soon, that he will take a test and noone will be able to deny it, if he prevails and shows off doing it. Until then everybody can take their turn, saying what they think will happen.
But in Bushbabys case he's gonna make excuses no matter what Alvarez does. Alvarez could knock trout in the first round and he will just play down Trout and act like his win over Cotto was fluke. Bushbaby hates Canelo because he's popular plain and simple.
It's similar to when I watched Ray Leonard in the Olympics, before he even turned pro. I thought he was special. When I watched John Elway at Stanford, before he turned pro, I thought he was special. Alvarez has fought long enough to formulate an opinion of his skills. Yeah, I think he is special, even if the common knowledge is he hasn't beaten anyone of note.
But the time is coming up soon, that he will take a test and noone will be able to deny it, if he prevails and shows off doing it. Until then everybody can take their turn, saying what they think will happen.
But in Bushbabys case he's gonna make excuses no matter what Alvarez does. Alvarez could knock trout in the first round and he will just play down Trout and act like his win over Cotto was fluke. Bushbaby hates Canelo because he's popular plain and simple.
As usual, you don't know what you're talking about. I've said countless times, if canelo wins this fight fairly I will have nothing but respect for the guy. So there goes your useless propaganda down the drain.
It's similar to when I watched Ray Leonard in the Olympics, before he even turned pro. I thought he was special. When I watched John Elway at Stanford, before he turned pro, I thought he was special. Alvarez has fought long enough to formulate an opinion of his skills. Yeah, I think he is special, even if the common knowledge is he hasn't beaten anyone of note.
But the time is coming up soon, that he will take a test and noone will be able to deny it, if he prevails and shows off doing it. Until then everybody can take their turn, saying what they think will happen.
But see, the thing about the Olympics is that amateur or not, your fighting the best amateur fighters in the world. So I don't see how you're trying to compare that to a so called champion that was given his title and allowed to defend it against fighters who he was supposed to beat.
Comment