Top 10 Heavyweights of all times.

[LacedUp]

Not the McCall rematch, McCalls demons took care of that and he never rematched mercer, even though a lot believe mercer won

Through no fault of his own. -he beat Mercer.

[BattlingNelson]

Lennox took care of his own rematches.

But yet he didn't give Rahman or McCall a return. It's 1 all.

[LacedUp]

But yet he didn't give Rahman or McCall a return. It's 1 all.

Whoever gets the last laugh, right?

[BattlingNelson]

Whoever gets the last laugh, right?

The score is a draw.

[Simurgh]

Still waiting for Wlad to 'Golota' somebody in the first round as Lennox and every other great did in their title defenses. Hell Id be happy if he could 'Michael Grant' an opponent at this point.

WLad spent more time with 40 year old midget Mormeck than Lennox spent with GOlota/Grant combined. Its sad really.

I don't really put that much weight on 1st round KOs. It's more due to style. Wlad likes to box, nothing wrong with it - I get more value for my ticket =)

Moreover I believe Wlad's KO ratio is greater than Lennox's (again this doesn't carry lot of weight for me).

[DreamFighter]

But yet he didn't give Rahman or McCall a return. It's 1 all.

I think in MacCalls case, yes you have a point - in fact I believe that 2nd fight should have been postponed on medical grounds till McCall was well. A rubber match at least was expected.

In Rahmans case, we all know the Rock would have broken 2nd time round too. He was a heavy hitter who got lucky against a daydreaming Lewis but not much more.

I am personally a bit oooo errrr about Lewis being top five, though I have him at 4 baed on his prime attributes and accomplishments that are pretty fiendish, I am very tempted to shift him down out of the top five.

[Simurgh]

I think in MacCalls case, yes you have a point - in fact I believe that 2nd fight should have been postponed on medical grounds till McCall was well. A rubber match at least was expected.

In Rahmans case, we all know the Rock would have broken 2nd time round too. He was a heavy hitter who got lucky against a daydreaming Lewis but not much more.

I am personally a bit oooo errrr about Lewis being top five, though I have him at 4 baed on his prime attributes and accomplishments that are pretty fiendish, I am very tempted to shift him down out of the top five.

Good good, you are improving. Post without mentioning Wlad. Now lets hear your top10

[DreamFighter]

Good good, you are improving. Post without mentioning Wlad.

Why would I, that's your job. But now you've mentioned him again.

Now lets hear your top10

its already been posted a long time ago,

[BattlingNelson]

I think in MacCalls case, yes you have a point - in fact I believe that 2nd fight should have been postponed on medical grounds till McCall was well. A rubber match at least was expected.

Yeah. But why didn't Lummox give the return?

In Rahmans case, we all know the Rock would have broken 2nd time round too.

No we don't.

He was a heavy hitter who got lucky against a daydreaming Lewis but not much more.

Whether he got lucky or not, the thing is that Lummox got flattened against a guy that surely no top 5 HW had any business losing to.

I am personally a bit oooo errrr about Lewis being top five, though I have him at 4 baed on his prime attributes and accomplishments that are pretty fiendish, I am very tempted to shift him down out of the top five.

Well all-time rankings are by definition highly subjective. Personally I find such a high ranking far-fetched at best.

[DreamFighter]

Yeah. But why didn't Lummox give the return?

that's what I am in effect asking you, but rather I would have preffered McCall being vetted fully medically first time and the rematch being postponed, surely the right way to do things. I want prime versus prime, and I certainly don't want to be kept waiting till someone is 34 before facing them again, you see, that would be utter crap.

Whether he got lucky or not, the thing is that Lummox got flattened against a guy that surely no top 5 HW had any business losing to.

yes, that's my point again. You seem to be paraphrasing what I wrote. Thats all good though, and its your prerogative.

Well all-time rankings are by definition highly subjective. Personally I find such a high ranking far-fetched at best.

I am glad you have at last added a fresh statement.