Saul "Canelo" Alvarez vs. Austin "No Doubt" Trout: who will win?

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

Great fight, Canelo won a very close decision IMO. It could have gone either way doe.

But yeah, there's a huge room for improvement for both Saul and Trout. Felt like Saul was gassed or he hurt his leg/s, or he did not train properly. He needs to go back to the drawing board- new S&C coach and maybe even a new trainer, fight more often as well no more long periods of inactivity.

Also, two of those judges need to be banned from their profession, but we all know that will never happen. ***ien WBC!

What two judges? Cause two of the judges DID have it pretty close. 115-112, and 116-111 isn't exactly a landslide I scored it 114-113 but there were a couple of close rounds that I gave to Trout that you could've gave to Canelo so IMO two of the three judges got it right.

[fceeviper]

I thought 116-111 was still too wide. Imo


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[bojangles1987]

Alvarez is the biggest fraud in boxing, and this fight ended up being a joke.

1. I don't have a problem with scoring it for Alvarez.

2. It was still a robbery. Two judges apparently went into this fight scoring it for Alvarez before the opening bell.

**** Golden Boy and this fake champion they created. Everything about Saul Alvarez is fake.

[DARKSEID]

Canelo clearly won. He stayed at the end of Trout's jab in the first half of the fight, rolled most of his punches and landed the cleaner more effective shots. He stayed in control of the fight with his suprisingly good defense and made Trout miss a lot.

Something I noticed about all the people saying Trout was robbed.. They keep talking about his activity and his pressure and how he stayed in control of the fight.

This is boxing. There are only 2 main criteria to judge.

A. Which punches landed

and

B. Which punches missed.


It doesn't matter how good somebody's footwork or generalship is if they miss their punches. Compared to a guy with bad footwork and generalship if they land their punches.

[New England]

Alvarez is the biggest fraud in boxing, and this fight ended up being a joke.

1. I don't have a problem with scoring it for Alvarez.

2. It was still a robbery. Two judges apparently went into this fight scoring it for Alvarez before the opening bell.

**** Golden Boy and this fake champion they created. Everything about Saul Alvarez is fake.

so you're saying that he won the fight against a guy who was considered a top fighter, and somebody he would "duck," but he's still a fraud?

[sicko]

Trout box circles around him but Canelo gets saves with a Controversial Decision...either they call it a draw or they just flat out ROB Trout to keep the possibility of a Mayweather vs Canelo fight open

^Went Exactly How I Thought It Would! While I thought Trout did out-box him, I underestimated Canelo Skills, he showed a little versatility in this fight and Trout did not "BOX Circles Around Him", Canelo head movement was outstanding, showed a little slickness and more athleticism then he gets credit for

[The Hammer]

Full fight here:

[junior gong]

So much ****ing whining...I have just caught up with the fight, and much like last week I saw a good fight between two very good fighters. Sometimes I think 'boxing' fans dont actually like boxing at all.

[konfirm]

Canelo clearly won the fight. The commentating was so disgraceful it made me sick to my stomach.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I thought the fight was a draw tbh..But I can't be mad that Alvarez won the fight..Good for him and cong**** on his big win..

The scorecards to this fight was horrible tho,and the fact they told you who won the rd was also wack and took away from this fight imo..