Is Joe Calzaghe an ATG?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #71
    Originally posted by grape drink
    If Joe Calzaghe is an ATG then so is Froch, seing as how his resume is actually better than Calz's.
    Nonsense.

    Calzaghe beat the PRIME version of Kessler, and Froch lost to a somewhat faded version.

    Calzaghe beat a lot of good fighters: Eubank, Woodhall, Reid, Brewer, Mitchell, Lacy, Bika, Sheika (who was coming off a win over Glen Johnson), 30-0 Veit, still-good Hopkins (who schooled Pavlik after that, let's not forget people were saying Pavlik would KO Calzaghe) and his best win: prime Mikkel Kessler.

    Calzaghe had longevity and a consistency we haven't seen from Froch, at least not yet.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48371
      • 4,778
      • 266
      • 104,043

      #72
      Originally posted by Freedom.
      Right, that's why you were rooting for David Haye, as I recall.


      No, I certainly was not.

      I was rooting and hoping for Wlad to knock Haye out cold.

      Comment

      • Pullcounter
        no guts no glory
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 42582
        • 549
        • 191
        • 49,739

        #73
        no calzaghe is not an ATG... Froch has a better resume than cokezaghe even though Froch has losses

        Comment

        • FightScorer
          Banned
          • Nov 2012
          • 300
          • 30
          • 0
          • 392

          #74
          Originally posted by Pullcounter
          no calzaghe is not an ATG... Froch has a better resume than cokezaghe even though Froch has losses
          Maybe. Hard to tell tbh. Froch might have lost to Dirrell as well.

          Comment

          • techliam
            Caneloweight Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 5525
            • 370
            • 23
            • 42,424

            #75
            Nop. Didn't beat Hopkins imo. The only good win he had was against Kessler. Beating 1 good fighter doesn't mean you're an all time great.

            RJJ v Calzaghe at 168, theres no debate really.

            Comment

            • FightScorer
              Banned
              • Nov 2012
              • 300
              • 30
              • 0
              • 392

              #76
              Originally posted by techliam
              Nop. Didn't beat Hopkins imo. The only good win he had was against Kessler. Beating 1 good fighter doesn't mean you're an all time great.

              RJJ v Calzaghe at 168, theres no debate really.
              That Hopkins fight was ****ing ****. They both should have lost.
              One of the worst fights ever. This is the double standards when it involves

              two fights.
              Hopkins-Calzaghe and Haye-Wlad.
              People like to point fingers at Haye and Hopkins, but realistically Calzaghe and Wlad fought like boring ****s as well.

              Comment

              • techliam
                Caneloweight Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2012
                • 5525
                • 370
                • 23
                • 42,424

                #77
                Originally posted by FightScorer
                That Hopkins fight was ****ing ****. They both should have lost.
                One of the worst fights ever. This is the double standards when it involves

                two fights.
                Hopkins-Calzaghe and Haye-Wlad.
                People like to point fingers at Haye and Hopkins, but realistically Calzaghe and Wlad fought like boring ****s as well.
                Agree with you there

                Comment

                • Saint G Groves
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 76
                  • 6
                  • 1
                  • 6,147

                  #78
                  On ability? Yes Joe was a great fighter

                  On achievement? No, ATG status is reserved for the likes of Sugar Ray Leonard, Evander Holyfield, Tommy Hearns, Ali and great fighters of that ilk. Joe does not belong in that company on achievements.

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30076
                    • 2,143
                    • 812
                    • 105,596

                    #79
                    Originally posted by Skittlez
                    Try to refute his ATG status and I will shut you down.

                    He is an ATG and the best SMW of all times.
                    His resume isnt the most in depth, but i think to get in ATG i think your talent should get your foot in the door on certain occasions, and for JC id leave the door open.

                    Same thing with Floyd, his resume isnt the best but on his talent id leave it open for him as well.

                    Comment

                    • shade darkar
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 6460
                      • 227
                      • 337
                      • 12,996

                      #80
                      not in my opnion. he didnt fight the best.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP