I understand the who not when portion of your argument. In fact, if you check my history, I was one of the main advocates of that theory on here.
But no matter how you cut it, this whole thing of "this guy beat that guy means he can beat that guy" is wrong.
I could find a way for Mayweather to beat Tyson if that was the case.
Of course you can't count guys that are over the hill in making your evaluation, but it ultimately comes down to styles no matter how you cut it.
But no matter how you cut it, this whole thing of "this guy beat that guy means he can beat that guy" is wrong.
I could find a way for Mayweather to beat Tyson if that was the case.
Of course you can't count guys that are over the hill in making your evaluation, but it ultimately comes down to styles no matter how you cut it.
Comment