Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It is INTELLECTUALLY & ANALYTICALLY DISHONEST to rank fighters with NO FIGHT FOOTAGE

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I agree, the old fighters would have got sparked out by todays top fighters. Just like Ruth wouldn't be as good in todays Era, Wilt Chamberlin wouldn't have dominated in basketball, and Pele wouldn't thrive like he did in his era. It's like that in every sport bro.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
      You genuinely don't know the race of most of those fighters, do you?

      And if the "Majority of fighters on my list" are black then why did you say to Bojangles "You should see his list" as a direct response to the "Race issue"?

      The hole you're digging is getting quite deep at this point. Just so you know.

      what hole? i stand firm by my OP post. just because you have black fighters in your list doesnt mean race is not an issue along with having no fight footage and the time period they fought in in regards to ATG list specifically harry greb.

      I stand strong and firm that you cannot rank a great fighter with no fight footage over a great fighter with fight footage because it is analytically dishonest.

      You sound like a typical white person who says "well we elected a black president that means no more racism."

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by DTMB View Post
        what hole? i stand firm by my OP post. just because you have black fighters in your list doesnt mean race is not an issue along with having no fight footage and the time period they fought in in regards to ATG list specifically harry greb.

        I stand strong and firm that you cannot rank a great fighter with no fight footage over a great fighter with fight footage because it is analytically dishonest.

        You sound like a typical white person who says "well we elected a black president that means no more racism."
        No.

        YOU are the one saying "It's a race thing"

        YOU are the one saying "You should see his list" in a direct response to the race issue. CLEARLY implying that my list is full of and predominantly white fighters.

        So, there's my list.

        Show Bojangles why he should "See my list". What did you mean by "You should see his list" when directly responding to his post about white fighters? Please, explain.

        I think it's clear to see you do not know the race of the majority of those fighters.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
          No.

          YOU are the one saying "It's a race thing"

          YOU are the one saying "You should see his list" in a direct response to the race issue. CLEARLY implying that my list is full of and predominantly white fighters.

          So, there's my list.

          Show Bojangles why he should "See my list". What did you mean by "You should see his list" when directly responding to his post about white fighters? Please, explain.

          I think it's clear to see you do not know the race of the majority of those fighters.

          actually i do and i have stated multiple times that its not just race but the time period they fought in and the fact that there's no fight footage.

          You're just e-motionally hurt because you are one of the vanguards of old school boxing that like to hype up harry greb and the likes.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by DTMB View Post
            cmon bo how many times have we heard the boxing was so much better back then than it is now cliche?


            you cannot rank a great fighter with no fight footage over a great fighter with fight footage.

            You just cant.

            It is analytically and intellectually dishonest.
            shut up ******. you go by accomplishments. its a fact the talent pool was waaay bigger back then. The amount of pro fighters was 20 times what it is today. By your logic the past didnt happen and anyone with footage is automatically better

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by DTMB View Post
              having the majority of black fighters on your list doesnt take away the fact that a lot of these old school fighters are held to great status DESPITE NOT HAVING FIGHT FOOTAGE because race along with the time period they participated in ie mob controlled era and a inferior era athletically.
              you have zero reason to believe they were inferior idiot. They were not. aside from smaller heavyweights. What is so great about guys fighting today? Protein shakes?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DTMB View Post
                what hole? i stand firm by my OP post. just because you have black fighters in your list doesnt mean race is not an issue along with having no fight footage and the time period they fought in in regards to ATG list specifically harry greb.

                I stand strong and firm that you cannot rank a great fighter with no fight footage over a great fighter with fight footage because it is analytically dishonest.

                You sound like a typical white person who says "well we elected a black president that means no more racism."
                you sound like a typical idiot who had a thought and now thinks it is the rule and can not be challenged in any way shape or form. Next thing you know you'll be going on a rant about evolution.

                Comment


                • #38
                  i agree with everything you said ...i hate to bring race into it but sad to say it has a lot to do with it ..preserve the history of certain boxers based on race....people aint blind

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    This thread is bring racist fl-mos and racist ptards together in unity. They have to decided to call a truce and join forces against sane boxing fans and destroy their credibility so that then they could restart the ptard f-mo flame wars but this tim not for p4p supremacy but rather atg supremacy.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      lol,here we go

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP