Miguel Cotto at his peak. Would you consider him a GREAT fighter?

[savorduhflavor]

Based on sheer ability/talent, at his peak, I would say Cotto was arguably a great fighter. (I say, "was," because I think Miguel is past his best.) But I think he falls just shy of being called "great"...just shy.

Agree with this word for word.

[jazluvr]

Based on sheer ability/talent, at his peak, I would say Cotto was arguably a great fighter. (I say, "was," because I think Miguel is past his best.) But I think he falls just shy of being called "great"...just shy.

Yep, i also agree^^^He had some great moments, and was/is a very good fighter/boxer, but not enough to be called great overall. Close, though.

[thepower]

Very good but not great for me.

[IronDanHamza]

No, not even close.

[bojangles1987]

No. He was pretty good.

[Ringlife]

Cotto has fought alot of good fighters through out his career. Cotto is a fan favorite fighter a really good fighter but not great. He was never the same fighter after the Margarito fight that fight took a lot out of him. Its really hard to say anything bad about Cotto he has fought everybody.

[shade darkar]

very good fighter. still is today. top ten p4p imo. borderline for HOF.

[El Angel]

He's right there. Very close IMO.

[RIZO24]

He was good but never great.. I never liked the guy.

[Ivansmamma]

Floyd and Pacquiao are great fighters. De La Hoya is a great fighter who lost his biggest fights. Cotto is not a great fighter but he fought some great fighters and put up a great fight.