credible? lol. Rios is a plodding come forward prototypical cherrypick for Pac, who's had one fight at 140, and now he's supposed to be a 'credible' opponent for Pac at 147? Put down the glue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
which is a more credible fight? rios/pac or canelo/may
Collapse
-
Canelo Mayweather is far more credible than Manny vs Rios. Rios hasn't even fought at 147 yet and you know Pacman isn't coming down to 140 to fight him. Both fights are a farce but at least Canelo has been campaigning at 154 and though titles don't mean much these days he is champ at 154. Not even close here.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Ggurts si kab View Postwhat you think? at 140 and 154.
Oct 2012 creation date and 215 posts, and thread labeling floyd a cherry picker and manny/rios-a mismatch of the highest order-is labeled a FOTY candidate. (How come everytime manny fights a blown up LW or JWW its a FOTY candidate? what no ww to fight?)
Hmm i'd say its subhuman or d4thincarnation- someone correct me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View PostMayweather vs Alvarez is more credible. Theyre both champions at 154 decent fight. Pac Rios can be a more credible fight with just 1 or 2 fights. He gets a 140 strap or whips a 147 top 10 contender than pac rios is a great fight in every category. Legacy, legitimacy and excitement.
I concur. Couldn't have said any better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Derranged View PostI agree. Neither fight is more credible than the other.
I'm a Mayweather fan. FAN, not fanboy, flomo or whatever other word they're called these days, and I am not in support of the Alvarez fight.
Comment
Comment