Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson Loses Temper Over **** Case Question

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Disclaimer - I'm NOT a Tyson fan, NEVER was, actually.

    I was the happiest mofo when Buster beat the brakes off of him. With that said, here are my responses:

    Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
    That sounds exactly like something somebody would say who did commit a ****.
    Must have heard your father (if you knew him) say that many times....

    Originally posted by robson24 View Post
    if they released photos of the bruises on these woman that he allegedly ****d back then it would of clarified it up but all those woman were talking **** trying to get mikes $ they all pieces of ****
    They didn't because there was none....

    Originally posted by flushuppercut View Post
    I believe if he did do it he would say he did. Ive watched him and read about him
    and i think he is about as REAL as a human being can be.People tend to have a "Sheep" mentality and are so quick to judge when they dont even have 10%
    of the evidence and information needed to judge someone.
    And even if he did do it,he did the time- so let it be
    It's true - 90% of the world's population are either sheep, a$$holes or both....

    Originally posted by Taaj Manzoor View Post
    Good Ol' Mike!
    What does that mean?

    Originally posted by -Lowkey- View Post
    He should of had the presence of mind and the intelligence to realize he was going to be asked those kind of questions without getting angry.

    Personally I don't agree with country's bending there rules to allow convicted rapists into there country just because it happens to be a famous convicted rapist.
    No one really cares how you personally feel about country's policies. You probably watch Roman Polanski films, GTFOH......

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    Why is it that Mike gets the benefit of the doubt for such a dastardly, de****able crime? While others who just have rumors, but never proved, are deemed much worse?

    Hell, that joke of an actor Zach Galifinakis refused to work with Mel Gibson, yet had no problems working with Mike Tyson? Hmmm, let's see here, one guy says some racist ****. . Just words. . The other guy is convicted of the worst thing you can do to another human save murder them. Tyson has also said racist **** as well. . .


    I just don't get the double standards. Him flipping out just makes him look more guilty. He should be thanking NZ for letting him in their beautiful country, and be more than respectful.
    Child please, this is the world we live in, the "civilized" world that Mike didn't create the laws/rules, but was born into. Have a real beef with it, then change it.......

    Originally posted by nycsmooth View Post
    still a punk..he deserves what he gets as time moves along...c 10 years from now if he's alive...
    You from the 'Ville? Sounds like you have a personal beef with dude......

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    LOL, you've never met Mike Tyson in your life. Everybody here has seen, and heard him.

    I think he is capable of ****, and I believe he did **** her. He probably was angry, and she knew how to push his buttons to make it worse, and he snapped, and ****d her.

    He went to court, that means all the evidence there could possibly be, from BOTH sides, were presented. Obviously a jury of his peers did not find any reasonable doubt that he was not guilty. . . Are there wrongful convictions? Sure there are! I don't see any reason to doubt his innocence more than the next man who claims he's innocent, though. In fact, judging by the behavior I have seen, I think he is guilty of raping her.

    Why would he admit he ****d a woman? Mike is no fool. . He knows he still has a name, and a persona to make money off of. If he admitted he ****d her, nobody would touch him, and he'd be broke again. . . .
    That was one of the most ******est posts ever......

    Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
    I think Mike Tyson was a victim of his own success. He was young, black, rich and famous. Didn't have an education or the sense to know better. My thing has always been. Why would this girl come to Mike's room at midnight without looking for something? I think the sex was consensual but Mike was too rough and probably disrespected her in some way and then she called **** and got paid.
    She acted like a jump-off and got mad when Mike treated her like one & got more than even.....

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    Blah, blah, blah. Plenty of young black people get rich, and famous. . .

    Tyson was convicted by a jury of his peers after hearing days, upon days of testimony, and evidence from both sides.

    **** isn't just a guy beating a girl down, and forcing sex on her. They could have been having sex, and Mike wanted to do something, a different position, or got rough, and she said "stop, stop." and Mike didn't stop. I don't think it's fair to the victim that you discount her. If she was faking it, odds are definitely against her that she'd be exposed.

    I can't believe people can say it didn't happen, after seeing Tyson behave? Biting a guy's ear? Lol, well, Holyfield was beating the ever living **** out of him. . Making racist comments, and telling guys you're going to **** them?
    With that **** description, sounds like you've been there before - GUILTY!

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    Known better from what? Being ****d? I don't know what happened, the only people who really know what happened are Tyson, and the broad. However, it's very rare that a person is wrongfully convicted. Everybody in prison right now will proclaim their innocence. I have faith in our criminal system, despite the occasional flub-up.

    I'm not judging him solely off his behavior, but I just think that buttresses his capability to commit a ****. He obviously was a very angry guy, especially towards women.

    Reuben Carter's innocence is a matter of debate. The conviction was set aside eventually, but if you look at all the evidence (I have), there's a lot there that makes me believe there's a good chance he was at least involved someway in the murders (whether or not he was the actual killer or not). I hope you're not basing what you know off the movie with Denzel - that movie is nothing but a fairy tale, and lies. LOL, one of the boxers successfully sued for defamation because they made it seem like the only reason he won was because he was white, and the referee, and judges beez raceest n sheet.


    Gatti committed suicide. There's no way that little girl could have hung Gatti. He was a man with a lot of demons - he had beat her earlier that night, and got publicly shamed by the Brazilians. he had a drug, and alcoholc problem as well. Nobody was seen coming in, or out of the room on surveillance cameras either.
    The second most ******est post ever........

    Originally posted by tredh View Post
    LLS so a man shouting that he is innocent makes him look guilty in some peoples eyes. WOW the logic with that one is crazy. So I guess to yall a man shouting he is guilty makes him look innocent?

    Did somebody just bring up Tyson's trial and conviction but fail to mention that he didn't even have a criminal trial lawyer represent him. Tyson's trial lawyer was actually a practicing tax attorney. So how good a defense did he really have he might as well have represented himself.

    I don't care who likes it I will believe Tyson is innocent until the day I die or he says he did it.
    I'm not a Mike dude either & I know he didn't **** that hag....

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    No, what somebody says regarding their guilt, or innocence really shouldn't matter that much. Everybody in prison right now says they didn't do it.

    I just think his anger he exhibits (not just about this) shows he is a man capable of ****. That, coupled with the fact a jury of his peers convicted him, makes me believe he did in fact **** that broad.


    The last sentence of your posts says it all: You're a hardcore Mike Tyson boxing fan, so you blindly support him in whatever he says, and does. You're incapable of objectively thinking about the issues.
    Damn, you keep coming with the hits! Not everyone who goes to jail says they didn't do it. Reciting what you've been told like a sheep, SMDH. All the dudes I know who have been locked up came clean. Come again rapist.......

    Originally posted by Mikhnienko View Post
    From what i remember didn't Don King supply his Lawyer for that case and he was a Tax Attorney who had never tried a criminal case before?
    Yep....

    Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
    I can find all kinds of isolated incidents about miscarriages of justice. It's not a perfect system, nor will it ever be. However, I can also look at the millions of people currently incarcerated, and find that 99% of them are guilty. Now I'm not saying we shoudl just say **** the 1% - it's more of a travesty for an innocent man to be convicted, than it is for a guilty man to walk free. . .

    Their have been studies done, and based on those studies, the chance of a man being falsely convicted, is rare. The odds are just heavily against it.

    About the hitman scenario, I don't agree with that, but if you think that is commonplace then I believe you're mistaken. Police, and prosecutors will cut deals with lesser offenders, to get the big dogs, but I don't hear very often about them valuing a drug dealer over a murderer. Out of the millions, and millions of convictions, and informants, etc. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a lot of examples like that.


    I just think your opinion about Tyson (not the CJ system) is biased because you're a big fan of Mike Tyson "the boxer" - so you will always believe Mike Tyson "the person.:
    And I believe from your comments you're a racist, so you will always be on the side of "the system" and vs. Mike......

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by MeanestNiceGuy View Post
      Still wondering why they keep bring this crap up. It's been about 20 years already.

      Gotta love the media and these "anti-this" and "anti-that" groups who constantly proves to be nothing more than @ss clowns.

      Leave the man alone, and be glad that he's gotten help along the way, and is able to contain himself nowadays.
      He's trying, but people can't leave well enough alone......

      Originally posted by UglyPug View Post
      I agree - he's served his prison time. He shouldn't have it brought up all the time.

      However, other countries damn well reserve the right on who they let in their country.

      So it's New Zealand's right to scrutinize Tyson before letting him come to their beautiful country. It's not like he's convicted of stealing a candy bar - he's a convicted rapist.

      He should be thankful they let him in their country to do his thing, and make money.
      Thankful? Is Mike a slave to be grateful for some scraps NZ is throwing at him? A country of less that 4.5 million people, GTFOH......

      Originally posted by tlarry View Post
      The story is this girl went out that night with Tyson in his limo. They messed around in the car, everything consensual. Everyone was happy, then they went back to Tyson's hotel room. She didn't have to go; she chose to go. They messed around, had consensual sex, she spent the night. Early the next morning she is up, singing and dancing in the bathroom doing her hair. She asked Mike if he'd wake up and walk her down to the limo, and he responded, "No, he needed a bit more sleep, before he left town that day". She got p***ed off, now feeling "used" from the night before, and stormed out of his hotel room, with a vendetta in mind, claiming "foul". Don King sets Tyson up with a tax attorney, rather than a top trial attorney, and Tyson had no chance to win that case. From very credible sources, that's the story that took place. Had Tyson got out of bed, walked her down to the car, returned to his room and back to bed, none of that would have happened to Tyson. So when these TV stations interview and continue to bring that incident up, I'm sure it becomes growingly more painful for him to hear, when he paid his price, cost him worldwide humiliation to start with, he's turned his life around, striving to be a good husband and father, and these rubes living back in the day still want to labor you down with that painful questions of that night.
      Exactly - the streets know what time it is.....she got mad that he treated her like she was - a stunt......Lame a$$ dudes talking about how they "feel", GTFOH with that BS. Come with facts.......

      Originally posted by APBrooklyn View Post
      Mike got taunted and/or setup that night....this is why us guys gotta watch out...Be careful fellas...especially us party-prone fellas in NYC....some girls get emotional and devious when they feel shameful about their actions. Two rules...1. Wrap It up! 2. Be nice to them the next morning before you politely kick them out! Haaa
      I stood next to Mike one night in Bentley's & didn't know it till my cuz put me on. Dude then went to the bar & about 30 females were elbowing each other for position. He should have known better.

      Originally posted by parrish duke View Post
      Mike seems like a pretty repentful , remorseful guy. Why would he **** her? people are habitual creatures and there is usually a pattern of sexual deviant behavior - there is none here, he did not do it. people who commit crimes that happened 20 + years ago do not get mad everytime its brought up, unless they are innocent, usually with this much time passing you repent, and make amends with the person and yourself (mike has gone the route of growing up and being accountable for his actions within his career, and he has never ever admitted to it, nor has he apologized about the alegged incident - he did not do it people - every chick in the world was after him, he just slid up into an opportunist who saw holes in his game that she was able to exploit, she will get hers my friends (if its already caught up with her, or if its about to - she will have to look in that mirror 1 day believe that) ..
      Not a religious dude, but the truth shall come to light & she will pay.....

      Comment


      • #53
        ^^^ I've seen a few keyboard warriors in my time but this guy takes it to a new level stick to posting in the YouTube comment section.
        Last edited by -Lowkey-; 10-02-2012, 11:56 AM.

        Comment


        • #54
          Only two people know what happened in that room, but I will say this: I saw Tyson's show on Broadway this summer and the section where he attacked the victim (or alleged victim) of the **** and the audience cheered like a pack of rabid hyenas made me very uncomfortable -- she wasn't there to defend herself, and it just seemed ugly.

          Comment


          • #55
            i heard mike started tearing off limbs

            Comment


            • #56
              I'd be pissed too if I was repeatedly asked questions about a crime I did time for 20 years after it happened.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by The Nephilim View Post
                Only two people know what happened in that room, but I will say this: I saw Tyson's show on Broadway this summer and the section where he attacked the victim (or alleged victim) of the **** and the audience cheered like a pack of rabid hyenas made me very uncomfortable -- she wasn't there to defend herself, and it just seemed ugly.
                Wow.

                Well...it's fair to say that people who would spend money to see a man sit on stage and merely talk about his life are fans of his. It's also fair to say that those very same fans wouldn't want to believe their hero is a rapist. Many would eagerly welcome "evidence" to the contrary, and would cheer on anything they could latch onto.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by The Nephilim View Post
                  Only two people know what happened in that room, but I will say this: I saw Tyson's show on Broadway this summer and the section where he attacked the victim (or alleged victim) of the **** and the audience cheered like a pack of rabid hyenas made me very uncomfortable -- she wasn't there to defend herself, and it just seemed ugly.
                  I agree with the bold.
                  Yet from his point of view, assuming he is innocent, he hates her, and doesnt care at all that she isnt there to defend herself.

                  With Mike, i personally cant put it past him. We all know he is capable of doing some seriously ****ed up things. So i cant assume he is innocent because he admits to doing all kinds of other stuff.
                  We will never know, and if i was in that audience, i would feel uncomfortable with him attacking Desree with everyone cheering.
                  Mike should bury that ****.
                  If he keeps talking about it, interviewers will keep asking about it.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    the way Mike was back then I don't doubt he did it.. he had a history of being aggresive with women, but he did his time.. and that was so long ago. He's a grown ass man now, why would they bring up **** that happened in his youth?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Napalm Death View Post
                      I'd be pissed too if I was repeatedly asked questions about a crime I did time for 20 years after it happened.
                      Of course. No one wants to be hounded about the same topic over and over, even if it's true.

                      But let's assume for a moment Tyson was rightfully convicted. The crime will continue to affect the victim long after her assailant "does his time." In that case, it's fair that he continue to he haunted by his actions just as his victim is. This notion that (at least with certain crimes like **** and murder) the ex-con has "paid his debt" and is now wiped clean of all responsibility is mistaken.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP