Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson Loses Temper Over **** Case Question

[mathed]

if they released photos of the bruises on these woman that he allegedly ****d back then it would of clarified it up but all those woman were talking **** trying to get mikes $ they all pieces of ****

That chick played him like a fiddle, she saw those dollars and took em.

[panicchaser]

Why is it that Mike gets the benefit of the doubt for such a dastardly, de****able crime? While others who just have rumors, but never proved, are deemed much worse?

Hell, that joke of an actor Zach Galifinakis refused to work with Mel Gibson, yet had no problems working with Mike Tyson? Hmmm, let's see here, one guy says some racist ****. . Just words. . The other guy is convicted of the worst thing you can do to another human save murder them. Tyson has also said racist **** as well. . .


I just don't get the double standards. Him flipping out just makes him look more guilty. He should be thanking NZ for letting him in their beautiful country, and be more than respectful.

Your comments are very visual and heavily laced with emotion and not enough sense.

'While others who just have rumors, but never proved, are deemed much worse?' is speculatory and in reference to Mike, IRONic. (pun intended) If you didn't understand that, i mean is the irony is that this statement also applies to Mike.

Zach's affiliation with Gibson and Mike have no importance to this issue aside from the fact that your comment is plain hateful! And that's based on your other narrow-minded comment that 'flipping out just makes him look more guilty.'

Wow!! you need to define 'double standards' because it sounds like you don't understand the definition. The only double standard is your pretentiously concerned comments about a trial that was purely based on false character defaming assumptions!

[Larry the boss]

they call that an outburst

[Frank Ducketts]

The truth never came out. A jury of his peers believed Washington over Mike. None of you truly knows what went down. Yall sound ****** as hell.

[panicchaser]

LOL, you've never met Mike Tyson in your life. Everybody here has seen, and heard him.

I think he is capable of ****, and I believe he did **** her. He probably was angry, and she knew how to push his buttons to make it worse, and he snapped, and ****d her.

He went to court, that means all the evidence there could possibly be, from BOTH sides, were presented. Obviously a jury of his peers did not find any reasonable doubt that he was not guilty. . . Are there wrongful convictions? Sure there are! I don't see any reason to doubt his innocence more than the next man who claims he's innocent, though. In fact, judging by the behavior I have seen, I think he is guilty of raping her.

Why would he admit he ****d a woman? Mike is no fool. . He knows he still has a name, and a persona to make money off of. If he admitted he ****d her, nobody would touch him, and he'd be broke again. . . .

Once again with your ridiculous comments! You say 'I think he is capable of ****.' YOU'RE capable of ****! I'M capable of ****. WE'RE ALL capable of ****. That doesn't mean he acted on it!! And so you also believe that any man who doesn't admit **** did it? You are 1 ****** a$$ fool to think that!! 'He knows he has a name, and a persona to make money off of.' Man... Mike is a very charitable man. You obviously do not know a THING about Mike!! I'm done wit' u... your flaws are WAY too see-thru!!

[panicchaser]

Blah, blah, blah. Plenty of young black people get rich, and famous. . .

Tyson was convicted by a jury of his peers after hearing days, upon days of testimony, and evidence from both sides.

**** isn't just a guy beating a girl down, and forcing sex on her. They could have been having sex, and Mike wanted to do something, a different position, or got rough, and she said "stop, stop." and Mike didn't stop. I don't think it's fair to the victim that you discount her. If she was faking it, odds are definitely against her that she'd be exposed.

I can't believe people can say it didn't happen, after seeing Tyson behave? Biting a guy's ear? Lol, well, Holyfield was beating the ever living **** out of him. . Making racist comments, and telling guys you're going to **** them?

'They could have been having sex?'

My man... you got a GRRRREAT imagination!!

[La_Vibora]

Cu****uyNYC, UglyPug, and the rest that believe that Mike is guilty, look it is obvious that neither side can agree on anything other than the fact that the only two people that know what happened for real are Ms. Washington and Tyson. So taking our beliefs out of the situation, can you guys atleast agree that in a court system that is innocent until proven guilty, the evidence presented in this case by the prosecution was not sufficient enough for a conviction, can we atleast all agree on that point?

[panicchaser]

I didn't say he didn't or condone what he may or may not have done but fact still remains that the girl came through and should have known better and so should he. None of us know what really happened in the room on that night but you are judging from just a persons behavior. The most vicious and sadistic criminals and serial killers were all nice and quiet people. Hurricane Carter was a very outspoken person about whites and racism towards blacks and was convicted by a jury of his peers and it turned out that he was innocent. Arturo Gatti death is still considered a suicide even though his wife acts like she is guilty. In this world nothing is perfect or as it seems.

Well stated!

[panicchaser]

Known better from what? Being ****d? I don't know what happened, the only people who really know what happened are Tyson, and the broad. However, it's very rare that a person is wrongfully convicted. Everybody in prison right now will proclaim their innocence. I have faith in our criminal system, despite the occasional flub-up.

I'm not judging him solely off his behavior, but I just think that buttresses his capability to commit a ****. He obviously was a very angry guy, especially towards women.

Reuben Carter's innocence is a matter of debate. The conviction was set aside eventually, but if you look at all the evidence (I have), there's a lot there that makes me believe there's a good chance he was at least involved someway in the murders (whether or not he was the actual killer or not). I hope you're not basing what you know off the movie with Denzel - that movie is nothing but a fairy tale, and lies. LOL, one of the boxers successfully sued for defamation because they made it seem like the only reason he won was because he was white, and the referee, and judges beez raceest n sheet.


Gatti committed suicide. There's no way that little girl could have hung Gatti. He was a man with a lot of demons - he had beat her earlier that night, and got publicly shamed by the Brazilians. he had a drug, and alcoholc problem as well. Nobody was seen coming in, or out of the room on surveillance cameras either.

You must really got a problem with Mike with your racist accusations. And then you turn around n say 'beez raceest n sheet?' <--- 'Cause that wasn't racist rite? pot/kettle much?

[CubanGuyNYC]

Cu****uyNYC, UglyPug, and the rest that believe that Mike is guilty, look it is obvious that neither side can agree on anything other than the fact that the only two people that know what happened for real are Ms. Washington and Tyson. So taking our beliefs out of the situation, can you guys atleast agree that in a court system that is innocent until proven guilty, the evidence presented in this case by the prosecution was not sufficient enough for a conviction, can we atleast all agree on that point?

I'm not certain Mike Tyson is guilty of raping Desiree Washington. I stated earlier that I once leaned towards him being innocent and I was swayed in the other direction. I wasn't on Tyson's jury (and neither was anyone on this forum), so I don't know everything they heard and saw. If you want us all to put our personal beliefs aside, then what other verdict can there be but "guilty"? A panel of twelve jurors were presented with all the available evidence from both sides and decided it was indeed enough for a conviction. As in all criminal trials held in the US, the verdict was unanimous.