Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson Loses Temper Over **** Case Question

[Weebler I]

A lot of you like to bring up Desiree's past which should also be done with Tyson. He's had an history of violence, domestic abuse and he groped an underage girl. If anyone was capable of **** it was Mike Tyson.

Sure, but he's also the type of person to just say he did it. Yet, even at his lowest he was adamant he never ****d her.

I don't care much for Tyson at all, but I think if he really did it then he'd have said it at least once publicly since back then.

[CubanGuyNYC]

http://www.amazon.com/Falsely-Accuse.../dp/B00597SCLS
This may be all you need while you are trying to tell me what to do. I got the impression that you implied that it is not true that Washington has had several cases where she falsely accused other men of raping her. Are you really this desperate or did I get the wrong impression from you?

Huh? What's the bold supposed to mean?

Anyway, I never implied anything. I've been quite clear. I have read on the Internet (that most reliable of sources) that Washington once made a **** allegation towards someone after the Tyson trial, which she later retracted. You state that there have been several. Where do you get this information?

The best I can tell, there are three books on Amazon dealing specifically with the Tyson **** trial. The one you provide the link to appears to state what the author's stance is in the title. The other two: "Heavy Justice: The State of Indiana V. Michael G. Tyson," by J. Gregory Garrison and "Down for the Count: The Shocking Truth Behind the Mike Tyson **** Trial," by Mark Shaw would have to be read in order to know what the authors' stances are. One needs a point/counterpoint in order to form an intelligent opinion. In "Bad Intentions: The Mike Tyson Story," Peter Heller opines that Tyson was guilty.

This is really ironic. I mean this is coming from you of all people. You've basicely ignored the significant issues I pointed out and continued to dwell on Tyson being guilty no matter what.

What "significant issues" did I ignore? I addressed what I thought was worthy of answering.

Since you'd love to know I'll tell you.The brilliant tax attorney that defended Mike came up with perhaps one of the greatest defenses in any court's history. Which was something similar to the way Farakhan defended Mike: She acted foolish by going to Mike's room at night, she should of known the dangers, almost as if it was entrapment. In short, that's how Mike's case was presented in court. Looking at it now, I would have been surprised if Mike wasn't found fuilty by those jurors considering the imbecile that was on his side trying to free him.

So, you're saying the jury found Tyson guilty based on a faulty defensive argument. I can see that. But I would still have to read the transcripts, or at least a reliable synopsis, myself. There could be more to it than what you're focusing on.

[Weebler I]

Man what fool really believes Mike ****d that broad? Mike has admitted all his drug use, violent abuse, criminal history...all his problems and faults, and yet he still refuses to admit he did this. Why wouldn't he if he did? He was already convicted and served time, he has no reason to lie.

Pretty much how I see it. There have been plenty of times in Tyson's life where he didn't care about anything and could have admitted it, but he didn't.

[CubanGuyNYC]

A lot of you like to bring up Desiree's past which should also be done with Tyson. He's had an history of violence, domestic abuse and he groped an underage girl. If anyone was capable of **** it was Mike Tyson.

Actually, both have received their share of scrutiny. But, in truth, all that stuff is circumstantial. Ultimately, what counts are the actions of the night in question. Sadly, we'll never know what really happened.

[CHOWWOKKA]

This is what I think happened.

Mike ****d her on the off chance that hopefully she was into that ****.

[gquezvas]

Why is it that Mike gets the benefit of the doubt for such a dastardly, de****able crime? While others who just have rumors, but never proved, are deemed much worse?

Hell, that joke of an actor Zach Galifinakis refused to work with Mel Gibson, yet had no problems working with Mike Tyson? Hmmm, let's see here, one guy says some racist ****. . Just words. . The other guy is convicted of the worst thing you can do to another human save murder them. Tyson has also said racist **** as well. . .


I just don't get the double standards. Him flipping out just makes him look more guilty. He should be thanking NZ for letting him in their beautiful country, and be more than respectful.

It's because people like you are always quick to point the finger regardless of the evidence. Even if he was not found guilty, idiots like you would still call him a rapist that got away. So many fools on here who talking smack. He did his time and it's done.

[CubanGuyNYC]

There have been plenty of times in Tyson's life where he didn't care about anything and could have admitted it, but he didn't.

I addressed this notion in an earlier post. I tend to agree that Tyson might well admit his wrongdoing if he understood it, and therefore believed it. It's quite possible that Tyson thinks what he did was okay, or that he's in denial about it.

Michael Vick (the [in]famous NFL quarterback) was convicted of inhumane treatment of animals for operating a dog-fighting ring. His supporters pointed to the culture that he was brought up in as explanation for his actions. It's a pretty good bet that Vick didn't, in his heart, view dog-fighting and the cruelty he perpetrated in the same light as the rest of us. I would wager that Tyson, and many others, have a different view of what constitutes **** than what's on the books.

[CubanGuyNYC]

*And now...breaking news*: Mike Tyson has had his visa to visit New Zealand cancelled.

[UglyPug]

It's because people like you are always quick to point the finger regardless of the evidence. Even if he was not found guilty, idiots like you would still call him a rapist that got away. So many fools on here who talking smack. He did his time and it's done.

Im not just pointing the finger at a guy taccused of **** . . i'm pointing the finger at a guy accused, charged, held to stand trial by a grand jury, and found GUILTY of **** after a trial.

WHo else am I accusing of **** aside from Tyson here?

Yeah, it is done - he's no longer in prison. But if he wants to travel to another country, then he should be prepared to face his past. Traveling to another country is not your right, it's a PRIVILEGE. He should be thankful? Did they dent him access? NO. They scrutinized his past, and asked him questions. He should be thankful they gave him the cahcne to explain himself.

You did the crime, nnow deal with it, and face the consequences, and repercussions that come along with it. Just like if you ****** a child, even after you serve your time, you deserve to be put on a "watch list."

[GRUSTLER]

Known better from what? Being ****d? I don't know what happened, the only people who really know what happened are Tyson, and the broad. However, it's very rare that a person is wrongfully convicted. Everybody in prison right now will proclaim their innocence. I have faith in our criminal system, despite the occasional flub-up.

I'm not judging him solely off his behavior, but I just think that buttresses his capability to commit a ****. He obviously was a very angry guy, especially towards women.

Reuben Carter's innocence is a matter of debate. The conviction was set aside eventually, but if you look at all the evidence (I have), there's a lot there that makes me believe there's a good chance he was at least involved someway in the murders (whether or not he was the actual killer or not). I hope you're not basing what you know off the movie with Denzel - that movie is nothing but a fairy tale, and lies. LOL, one of the boxers successfully sued for defamation because they made it seem like the only reason he won was because he was white, and the referee, and judges beez raceest n sheet.


Gatti committed suicide. There's no way that little girl could have hung Gatti. He was a man with a lot of demons - he had beat her earlier that night, and got publicly shamed by the Brazilians. he had a drug, and alcoholc problem as well. Nobody was seen coming in, or out of the room on surveillance cameras either.

How do you know this you say to be true for sure? Mike Tyson was/is capable of a lot of bizarre and violent behavior but I can't say he did it for sure because of how he acts and what he says. How many rapists and serial killers act very polite, shy and quiet? anything is possible but that girl was looking for something going to Mike Tyson's room on the late night creep. From what I heard, if it is true or not but the reason why the chick called **** was because Tyson splakked it and treated her like a slore. How true this is, I don't know. Kobe Bryant never showed any violent behavior or wild tendencies but that didn't stop a woman from accusing him and saying he ****d her. Right or wrong?