Martinez calls out Mayweather "I Will Crack Your Bones Like I Did To Chavez Jr"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deejd
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 3376
    • 88
    • 353
    • 10,029

    #281
    Originally posted by daggum
    they weren't the best at the time. going around beating second and third best fighters? why should we care? basilio fought the best, not just faded guys with trinket belts.
    So who should Mayweather have fought in May?

    Who should he have fought back when he fought DLH?

    And what fighter wouldn't fight DLH knowing what kind of money they'd make?

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 520
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #282
      Who was a better fighter than Oscar at 154 when they fought~ go google that **** up.

      Cory Spinks?
      Daniel Santos?

      Your best source for Boxing news, results, rumors, fights and rankings from the fan perspective.


      Yea that is a great list of fighters~ although in the other mentioned there is an interesting name just goes to show you how opinions change on a guy.

      I guess Floyd should have fought Martinez in 2007 when no one knew who the fuck he was because he was going to be a excellent fighter~ not even Margarito fans brought him up as a big win.
      Last edited by The Gambler1981; 09-27-2012, 09:06 PM.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #283
        Originally posted by daggum
        they weren't the best at the time. going around beating second and third best fighters? why should we care? basilio fought the best, not just faded guys with trinket belts.
        Fact Cotto was #1 at 154


        Oscar was #3 at 154

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43345
          • 4,516
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #284
          Originally posted by davis828
          So who should Mayweather have fought in May?

          Who should he have fought back when he fought DLH?

          And what fighter wouldn't fight DLH knowing what kind of money they'd make?
          it's not that he fought delahoya. it's about who he didn't fight. the guys dominating welterweight. instead he made comical excuses and retired. i guess you are happy with that from a professional boxer. strange.

          Comment

          • The Gambler1981
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 25961
            • 520
            • 774
            • 49,039

            #285
            Oscar was just as challenging considering Floyd is not a 154 pound fighter even now he is still very suspect in the class and the dudes at 147 never really amounted to all that much.

            Not like he missed fighting a prime Ray Leonard, they were just decent guys~ nothing more.

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43345
              • 4,516
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #286
              Originally posted by Mr LarryX
              Fact Cotto was #1 at 154


              Oscar was #3 at 154
              lol get out of here with that garbage. cotto beating unranked mayorga and margarito and 6th ranked foreman makes him number 1? we've already gone over the ring's bias. bundrage beat the #2 guy, the #5 guy, and the current wbo champ and he's rated 9th? cotto was rated 1 with his s-hit resume? kirkland beat angulo who was numbe 2 and he's only rated 8th? yet cotto and canelo who fought no one are 1 and 2? obviously sh-it.

              delahoya was also ranked 6th at the time of the floyd fight. he moved up to 3 after losing because he lost so well?

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43345
                • 4,516
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #287
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                Who was a better fighter than Oscar at 154 when they fought~ go google that **** up.

                Cory Spinks?
                Daniel Santos?

                Your best source for Boxing news, results, rumors, fights and rankings from the fan perspective.


                Yea that is a great list of fighters~ although in the other mentioned there is an interesting name just goes to show you how opinions change on a guy.

                I guess Floyd should have fought Martinez in 2007 when no one knew who the fuck he was because he was going to be a excellent fighter~ not even Margarito fans brought him up as a big win.
                what was so good about oscar at the time? he had 1 win in years and it was over ricardo mayorga? the other guys in the division were much more impressive at least in the last couple years. spinks and karmazin were the top guys and spinks won a close decision. was oscar-mayorga a fight between 2 unranked guys a great fight? you guys eat up hype like no other.
                Last edited by daggum; 09-27-2012, 09:16 PM.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39914
                  • 5,025
                  • 1,447
                  • 234,543

                  #288
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  they weren't the best at the time. going around beating second and third best fighters? why should we care? basilio fought the best, not just faded guys with trinket belts.
                  De La Hoya was #3 ranked by The Ring at 154. Cotto was ranked #1 by The Ring at 154. How were they not the best?

                  Comment

                  • deejd
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 3376
                    • 88
                    • 353
                    • 10,029

                    #289
                    Originally posted by daggum
                    it's not that he fought delahoya. it's about who he didn't fight. the guys dominating welterweight. instead he made comical excuses and retired. i guess you are happy with that from a professional boxer. strange.
                    It is that he fought DLH because you're complaining about him fighting faded fighters at '54. Last time I checked, faded fighters don't come off impressive performances and win titles. You're that guy that crawls out of your little hole when Mayweather beats the brakes off someone, yelling about who he should have fought and pouting about his selection of fights.

                    Let me guess, he shouldn't have drained Corrales and fought Casa instead, right?

                    Comment

                    • The Gambler1981
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 25961
                      • 520
                      • 774
                      • 49,039

                      #290
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      lol get out of here with that garbage. cotto beating unranked mayorga and margarito and 6th ranked foreman makes him number 1? we've already gone over the ring's bias. bundrage beat the #2 guy, the #5 guy, and the current wbo champ and he's rated 9th? cotto was rated 1 with his s-hit resume? kirkland beat angulo who was numbe 2 and he's only rated 8th? yet cotto and canelo who fought no one are 1 and 2? obviously sh-it.

                      delahoya was also ranked 6th at the time of the floyd fight. he moved up to 3 after losing because he lost so well?
                      Boxing isn't a numbers game~ it is what your eyes tell you.

                      My eyes tell me Cotto is a way better fighter than Bundrage, claiming Bundrage should be ranked higher based of beating guys higher in a ranking list you don't even has to be the dumbest thing you have ever fucking said.

                      Go watch some baseball you would fit in with all the nerds sucking Mike Trout ****~

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP