Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Cotto Welcomes The Danger of Facing a Hungry Trout

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by figzuki View Post
    you really seem confident that trout is gonna beat coto, but then again, you were confident that Chavez was gonna beat Martinez too...
    Ohh, wow. do you make it a habit of just making $h1t up??

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
      Ohh, wow. do you make it a habit of just making $h1t up??
      no...

      r u saying u never posted that chavez wa going to beat sergio? I remember, i seem to remember a lot of what u post due to your sig.

      Think you're a stand up poster man, i just recalled that u said chavez was going to beat martinez is all.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by figzuki View Post
        no...

        r u saying u never posted that chavez wa going to beat sergio? I remember, i seem to remember a lot of what u post due to your sig.

        Think you're a stand up poster man, i just recalled that u said chavez was going to beat martinez is all.
        Click on my name & go find out. I guarantee right here that you remember wrong though. I said the fight was gonna be tough & I couldn't pick a winner. I also never bet on the fight. You have me confused with someone else. Going against the grain as I often do, does make people imagine things though.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
          So you're saying that even though ginger already ducked Trout, he'll man up after Trout beats Cotto??

          If ginger ducked Trout before he has a (W) over Cotto on his resume, what makes you think he'll fight him after??
          Dyabolic just debated with me that the WBC rejected that fight, cause of a positive weed test back in the day, not Canelo ducking him. So which is it?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Fetta View Post
            Dyabolic just debated with me that the WBC rejected that fight, cause of a positive weed test back in the day, not Canelo ducking him. So which is it?
            I heard something of the sort. Don't have the proof. But judging by what I know about ginger, he'd have never fought Trout anyway. The proof?? Well that lies within his resume.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
              I heard something of the sort. Don't have the proof. But judging by what I know about ginger, he'd have never fought Trout anyway. The proof?? Well that lies within his resume.
              yeah because you should risk a potential $15-20 mil payday with floyd to fight Trout because posters on NSB will give you more respect.

              Cmon Bush!

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                yeah because you should risk a potential $15-20 mil payday with floyd to fight Trout because posters on NSB will give you more respect.

                Cmon Bush!
                Then people like you are gonna log on here & tell us all why we should give Floyd credit when he beats up ginger. Don't worry, I know the drill.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  Then people like you are gonna log on here & tell us all why we should give Floyd credit when he beats up ginger. Don't worry, I know the drill.
                  I don't need to do that. besides, it has nothing to do with my post. you sound ****** suggesting that a payday that rare and large should be risked to fight Austin trout at this point when common sense and economic sense says fight floyd, get paid, then earn more to fight trout down the road.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                    I don't need to do that. besides, it has nothing to do with my post. you sound ****** suggesting that a payday that rare and large should be risked to fight Austin trout at this point when common sense and economic sense says fight floyd, get paid, then earn more to fight trout down the road.
                    Has everything to do with your post actually. Here's how it plays out.

                    The Floyd fan will hype ginger going into the fight. Telling us (who know better), shamelessly that ginger is some young, elite hungery lion who's never lost & is coming for Floyd's head. The rest of us will only laugh at you guys.

                    Then when Floyd beats the crap outa him. You guys will come on boxingscene to brag like it's a great victory. The rest of us will tell you the truth, which is that ginger was a pampered, protected hype job.

                    Then you guys are gonna start crying about how Floyd never gets any credit. Then you will say that if he fought Martinez, he'd be drained at (154), like you know it's a fact. Then you'll say that Floyd wouldn't have gotten any credit anyway.

                    Like I said, I know the drill. I did not ask you to quote me. You defend the business, cherrypicking, sales, star power, how much money is made, the spread & so forth.. Me, I love boxing & want to see the best fights.

                    Comment


                    • #50

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP