Eder Jofre - Greatest bantamweight ever?
Collapse
-
-
That second win over Jose Medal could possibly be the best win or performance of his career. A really good win over a really good fighter.Shame you don't really much about this guy even on boxing forums as he was a fcukin' beast! He should for me anyway be right up there with the top ATGs
You talk heart, skills, power, iron chin - Eder Jofre!
72-2-4 (50 K.Os)
Whooped Legra, Saldivar, Caldwell, Caraballo, Aoki, etc etc
He fought 12 times in 9 months! won 10, 2 draws. Retired after two losses to Fighting Harada, came back after 3 years & whooped everyone at featherweight.
The only thing Jofre lacks is a real career defining win against another great fighter. A shame he didn't get the nod one of the Harada fights because that's all his career needed. Still a great fighter none the less.Comment
-
-
Here's an interesting bit I found on boxrec about Jofre's draw with Manny Elias between the two Harada losses.
Eder was ahead by 3 points on all three score cards at the end of 10 rounds. But under Brazilian rules you need a four-point margin to gain a verdict. Eder did not have a four-point margin against Elias, so the fight was declared a draw.
Strange rule I never heard of before.Comment
-
Makes you wonder about the other draws on his record. Under American Rules he very well might be 76-2.
Please, don't even get me started on Germany.
Comment
-
that's crazy rule but in a way seems to encourage boxers and they have to really beat their opponent to win...Here's an interesting bit I found on boxrec about Jofre's draw with Manny Elias between the two Harada losses.
Eder was ahead by 3 points on all three score cards at the end of 10 rounds. But under Brazilian rules you need a four-point margin to gain a verdict. Eder did not have a four-point margin against Elias, so the fight was declared a draw.
Strange rule I never heard of before.
it sounds crazy but would that rule in todays boxing bring more excitement, what do you think bros?Comment
-
In certain scenario's I would agree, such as Oscar-Tito. But it would be unfair to fighters who actually gave it there all. Look at it this way...lets say there are two guy dead even after 11 rounds (obviously there is a 10-8 round in there somewhere) and one fighter comes out and clearly dominates the final round, gives it everything to earn a hard fought but close fight. Is it fair to take a victory from him?Comment
-
yeah i agree it is not fair for all situations but at the least fighters going in a fight knows he has to dominate to win any half a_s performance he will end up with a draw, I also think it will serve as a reward for the fighter trying and punishment for half-a_s performance...In certain scenario's I would agree, such as Oscar-Tito. But it would be unfair to fighters who actually gave it there all. Look at it this way...lets say there are two guy dead even after 11 rounds (obviously there is a 10-8 round in there somewhere) and one fighter comes out and clearly dominates the final round, gives it everything to earn a hard fought but close fight. Is it fair to take a victory from him?
anyway it is still a crazy rule, maybe it was taken out for good reasons, was just thinking it would help bring more excitement...Comment
Comment