Originally posted by whirlwind
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's Worse: Pacquiao draining Cotto by 2 lbs, Or Ward draining Dawson by 7 lbs?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostBlack boxers get away with so much ****. From draining boxers, hometown fights, decisions, ducking to cheating. Chad Dawson has not fought at 168 in YEARS. These same guys praising Ward are the same ones that are critcizing Pac for two pounds on a WW at the time and DLH who hasn't fought at WW in years.
Comment
-
Cotto, easily. It was unecessary. Dawson-Ward is different because Dawson is meeting hmWard at his weight and issue the challenge. Its like trying to say Pac fought an unproven at 147 Bradley. That was their choice it was never a fight breaking decision like Pac's catchweight has apparently been. Dawson challenged Ward at 168. There was no dispute.
Comment
-
pacquiao-cotto is worse. they actually wanted cotto at 142 just like how they also wanted shane at 142. the way team pacquiao plays with weight is de****able.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slightly Dazed View PostThese poor souls being forced to drain against their will, without a choice or a voice. I weep for them.
It's business and if they make poor choices in their negotiations, then that's life.
But Chad was very eager to move down, and the negotiations were very smooth and fast, it took only eight days for both parties to sign the contract. Dawson always wanted the big names for some reason. He wanted a piece of Calzaghe, didn't get it. He called out Hopkins for like three years and he finally got the fight this year. This time he wants Ward. If Ward wasn't a name, Dawson would probably be fighting Shumenov right now.
Comment
-
shame at these people trying to justify Ward not budging on 168 Dawson is doing the same thing DLH did for the Pacquiao fight trying to make a weight he hasn't fought in for 8 years
not only that but Dawson has to fight him in his back yard
Comment
Comment