How is Pac still ranked P4P #1 on BS?

[bare knuckle]

Most of the ringside scribes said that Pacquiao won. Why can't youaccept that there are close fights quite a few of them, and these two fighters always make it close. And he beat Bradley well.

So the site is ignoring the "odd" Bradley result, and found no reason to take his off the #1 one spot. It's simple enough to understand if you think about it before writing.

The problem is most ring siders has Jmm beating Manny and he was even raised in the rankings yet Manny was not dropped

[edgarg]

Ok but most people also think he lost to a 38 year old lightweight.And don't people try to down Floyds Hatton win claiming his best weight was 140,even though he actually won a title at 147??Bradley won nothing at 147 and "OFFICIALLY" BEAT MANNY

Hatton got a gift decision against Collazzo. I don't think that even he thought he'd won. He immediately went back down to 140 and stayed there.

[bare knuckle]

And the biggest problem with all of this is Hopkins was dropped from the p4p list for shutting out Roy Jones.the reason was he didn't look good,but neither did Manny in his last 2 fights.

[bare knuckle]

Hatton got a gift decision against Collazzo. I don't think that even he thought he'd won. He immediately went back down to 140 and stayed there.

Hatton was the WBA ww champion............what had Bradley done at 147 before he fought Manny?? see you can't have it both ways man,you are contradicting yourself

[Jcsuper]

Im sorry man but what does any of that have to do with the fact that he should not be p4p#1 in 2012?

he's desperate. Leave him alone in his fantasy world.

[bare knuckle]

he's desperate. Leave him alone in his fantasy world.

That guy is not making a lick of sense.

[whirlwind]

No you are saying "Manny beat a young undefeated p4p fighter"(which he officially lost)but even if he got the win in your opinion it would mean nothing cause Bradleys best weight is 140 where he won all his fights right?

Well you have a point but still he officially lost and Mayweather officially won. The point he will never get a credit to the Pac haters because he officially lost. Lets talk about this when they reverse the decision and when the made Pac officially won the fight against Bradley. I may say those 2 fighs are equal in terms of whatever credit it may have.

[Johnwoo8686]

The non biased fans have had some very good posts here. Cliff's reasoning clearly demonstrates a double standard for Pacquiao. He loses to Marquez but it doesn't matter because he officially won that fight. He then goes on to officially lose to Bradley but that doesn't matter either because he won in the court of public opinion?

The same standard should be held for the Marquez fight as it was held for the Bradley fight. Floyd just beat two champions while Pacquiao has struggled with guys who fight below his weight class. Yet somehow Pac is p4p number one?

[whirlwind]

close fight = robbery? At this point you should realize even if the fight for 100 times the results will always be the same.

[bare knuckle]

Well you have a point but still he officially lost and Mayweather officially won. The point he will never get a credit to the Pac haters because he officially lost. Lets talk about this when they reverse the decision and when the made Pac officially won the fight against Bradley. I may say those 2 fighs are equal in terms of whatever credit it may have.