relax. thats just their opinion. it doesnt mean anything.
How is Pac still ranked P4P #1 on BS?
Collapse
-
-
1) He didn't lose to Castillo, contrary to popular belief amongst the people going through his career with a fine tooth comb the fight could have gone either way.
2) He rematched Castillo straight away and beat him decisively.
3) He was moving up in weight.
4) He was not number 1 p4p at the time. I think he was ranked 8.Comment
-
Yeah I see the difference. Pacquiao has a huge fan base and STILL the vast majority of the boxing public thought he got his butt handed to him by Marquez. Bradley has no fanbase whatsoever so of course people are going to think Manny won.
The point is Pacquiao has an official loss and a loss in the court of public opinion, so it's odd to claim that he' still the p4p best fighter in the world.Comment
-
This shows you didnt watch the fight after all and was taking a cue from a numerous floydiots in this site. I'm done with you.Yeah I see the difference. Pacquiao has a huge fan base and STILL the vast majority of the boxing public thought he got his butt handed to him by Marquez. Bradley has no fanbase whatsoever so of course people are going to think Manny won.
The point is Pacquiao has an official loss and a loss in the court of public opinion, so it's odd to claim that he' still the p4p best fighter in the world.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
If the retirement was fake, as you say, then that means floyd should never have lost his spot atop the p4p rankings because he never really retired right? Inactivity is not a rreason to lose your spot.
On the other hand, if it was real, he came back and fought the #2 p4p fighter, JMM, and beat him more decisively than Manny had. I think any fighter that returns from retirement and beats the 2nd best fighter in the world earns the right to be #1.
SInce floyd has been atop the p4p rankings, manny has lost twice, once questionably, had a draw , and got what many say is a gift decision vs JMM.
That is a strong argument for floyd being #1.Comment
-
END OF THREADThe non biased fans have had some very good posts here. Cliff's reasoning clearly demonstrates a double standard for Pacquiao. He loses to Marquez but it doesn't matter because he officially won that fight. He then goes on to officially lose to Bradley but that doesn't matter either because he won in the court of public opinion?
The same standard should be held for the Marquez fight as it was held for the Bradley fight. Floyd just beat two champions while Pacquiao has struggled with guys who fight below his weight class. Yet somehow Pac is p4p number one?
Comment
-
My god what is wrong with you man??are you serious or trolling???
compare Floyd and Mannys last 4 fights and it is not even close or debatable
Mannys last 4
Bradley-jww p4p top 10-lost(people think he won ok)
Jmm lw p4p top 5-won(most think he lost ok)
Shane-won (hadnt won a fight in 2 years)
Margarito-won(coming off of a suspension and a ko,beat a no name in Mexico)
Floyds last 4
Cotto-won-wba champ at 154
Ortiz-won-wbc ww champion
Mosley-won-p4p#3 and wba ww champion
jmm-won p4p#2 lw champ-floyd shut him out
this isnt even debatable Manny no way no how should be p4p top 5 let alone #1Comment
Comment