How is Pac still ranked P4P #1 on BS?

[whirlwind]

If the retirement was fake, as you say, then that means floyd should never have lost his spot atop the p4p rankings because he never really retired right? Inactivity is not a rreason to lose your spot.

On the other hand, if it was real, he came back and fought the #2 p4p fighter, JMM, and beat him more decisively than Manny had. I think any fighter that returns from retirement and beats the 2nd best fighter in the world earns the right to be #1.

SInce floyd has been atop the p4p rankings, manny has lost twice, once questionably, had a draw , and got what many say is a gift decision vs JMM.

That is a strong argument for floyd being #1.

You forgot Pac beat first a younger prime Marquez (no weight cheating) at his 2 best weight divisions, 126 and 130. FACT!

[CHOWWOKKA]

lol pacquiao doesnt even have a title, Randall Bailey ranks higher!

[bare knuckle]

Because you are ****** and can't comprehend simple things.

******??if we took a poll right now on who the idiot in this thread was i bet you'd win hands down

[littlemac]

Why does this guy keep posting the same thing over and over and keep getting owned over and over?

It's his coping mechanism. Give him a break.

[The Big Dunn]

You forgot Pac beat first a younger prime Marquez (no weight cheating) at his 2 best weight divisions, 126 and 130. FACT!

Doesn't matter. Manny drew with JMM at 126.

You said floyd's retirement was fake. If so, then he should have never lost his p4p #1 spot since he didn't retire.

Right.

[bare knuckle]

Because you are ****** and can't comprehend simple things.

You forgot Pac beat first a younger prime Marquez (no weight cheating) at his 2 best weight divisions, 126 and 130. FACT!

In 3 fights Manny has yet to "BEAT" Jmm

in the 1st fight he floored him 3 damn times and got a draw meaning he was outboxed badley

in the 2nd fight(which many think jmm won)he floored him and still got a split decision

in the 3rd fight(most think he lost)


so kill that noise

[whirlwind]

If the retirement was fake, as you say, then that means floyd should never have lost his spot atop the p4p rankings because he never really retired right? Inactivity is not a rreason to lose your spot.

On the other hand, if it was real, he came back and fought the #2 p4p fighter, JMM, and beat him more decisively than Manny had. I think any fighter that returns from retirement and beats the 2nd best fighter in the world earns the right to be #1.

SInce floyd has been atop the p4p rankings, manny has lost twice, once questionably, had a draw , and got what many say is a gift decision vs JMM.

That is a strong argument for floyd being #1.

LMAO! It was fake because he left in the welterweight division when it was too hot to handle (young prime Cotto, young prime Margarito and younger prime Mosley). You can't keep your p4p title by watching your enemies killing one another and when the dust settles down, you pop from nowhere claiming you are the best. Use your commons sense bro.

[littlemac]

Pacquiao took Marquez lightly? Yeah, right. He took a guy lightly who he already had 2 really tough fights with? :jerk: What a lame excuse.

Anyway, P4P rankings are hypothetical anyway. It's not like it really means much.

.......

[PAC-BOY]

Floyd 2008-2012

past prime Cotto
sucker punched Ortiz
past prime Mosley
weight cheated Marquez

Pacquiao 2008-2012

Pac beat Bradley in one sided but got robbed
Pac beat Marquez fairly, no weight cheating, fight can go either way
past prime Mosley
17 lbs weight advantage Margarito
one sided decision prime Clottey
tko12 prime Cotto
tko Hatton in rd2 and retired him for good
made him quit and retired Oscar for good
Diaz
beat the younger prime Marquez in a close fight


How do you justify that?

WOW! That was an E bltch slap if i ever saw one....:qqq: Nice one!

[The Big Dunn]

He didn't leave the division, according to you. You said floyd didn't retire. If he didn't retire then he didn't lose his p4p #1 spot. That is common sense.