Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch

[littlemac]

Is Brian Kenny a Bradley fan??If I'm not mistaken he is a Pac fan,and he saw it for Bradley 7-5 or maybe 8 to 4..It was a close fight,and swing rds went to what the person scoring the fight is looking for..Just so happens that the judges favored Bradley..At the end of the day it was no robbery,if ya had Pac winning I'm fine with that..But this was no 11-1 10-2 or 9-3 fight...Which is really my point,it ws close..In a close fight it can go eitherway...

Yes, apparently in these forums, if you don't see it for Manny your either a Pachater, Racist, or a Floyd lover. If you don't love Manny, your in a no win situation.

[littlemac]

Bradley didn't turn on anything. By the time we hit the last few rounds, everyone watching that fight knew that the results were academic UNTIL we all heard those bogus scores.

If the fight was at least close then I can say its just a matter of opinion and it went the way it went but not this fight.

Floyd should have fought Cotto BEFORE Cotto lost to Margarito. Instead he went on vacation. Hmmm, where have I heard that before? After the Margarito and Manny beating, he fought a few guys that he should have beat. So there was nothing to state that Cotto had a chance against Floyd. The fight happened too late. The nice thing about the fight was that Cotto did better than expected but he wasn't consistant enough to win that BUT if I closed my eyes, I would have done just like you are doing and say "Cotto schooled Floyd" because he did more in one round to Floyd than Bradley did the entire fight to Manny ... but that is not what happened. Floyd won.

Bwhahahahha, so you are the one. Last time you were claiming that you had't made those comments. Dude, your a pacstan and Floyd will always be in a no win situation in your eyes, and Manny will always be in a win win situation in your eyes. Its really pointless making arguments with you since your a bigot against anything that is not Manny.

You made threads about Floyd not fighting Cotto and then made threads how Floyd electing 8oz was not fair after Floyd had signed to fight Cotto and after Floyd beat Cotto with 10oz, you then now say Cotto is passed it. You see how no matter what Floyd does your just going to hate

[Rome-By-Ko]

It was a clear 8-4 fight....9-3 for pac fans and 7-5 for bradley fans like yourself mate, either way pac wins...

thing is man, you know and I know Pac won, bradley got a gift, the whole boxing community knows who won, that is good enough. Arum is a scum bag who needs to be put in a retirement home for his dodgy deals behind the scenes

i know you are a sound poster, you know it was a clear pac win

I truly believe Bradley won bro,I got the same shhit when I had Judah over Matthysee and when I said Matthysee won the Alexander fight but I only had him winning by 1 rd I got shhit...I did not see it as a robbery that Alexander won(a hometown decision yes but not a robbery),the same with the Peterson Ortiz fight..It seems like when a popular fighter is in close with a fighter who might not be that popular everyone crys and says robberie it was a bad decision or the wrong man won...The same with Froch Kessler,I thought Froch won but it was so close hey it could have went either way..You have to respect the judges..This was nothing like Pwill vs Lara..Which I did consider a true robbery...

[ADP02]

Is Brian Kenny a Bradley fan??If I'm not mistaken he is a Pac fan,and he saw it for Bradley 7-5 or maybe 8 to 4..It was a close fight,and swing rds went to what the person scoring the fight is looking for..Just so happens that the judges favored Bradley..At the end of the day it was no robbery,if ya had Pac winning I'm fine with that..But this was no 11-1 10-2 or 9-3 fight...Which is really my point,it ws close..In a close fight it can go eitherway...

Oh and the whole Pac is a Champ so he should win close rds is not the waay a judge is trained to watch fights either..The fighter who wins the rd wins the rd no matter if that fighter is a Champ or not..

Brian Kenny + 2 judges + you + some Bradley fans + some Manny haters had it for Bradley.

The rest of the world had it for Manny.

What I stated was that even if you give Bradley the rounds he won clearly plus all the close rounds, one still can't give him 7 rounds!

So now every round had a clear winner in your books? Bradley clearly won 7 rounds and Manny clearly won 5 rounds? I say no but your statements appear to indicate that. There were several rounds that were very close and hard to call. Those rounds the judge has to pick someone. Right? I said that even if you give all the close rounds plus the clear rounds, bradley still can't find 7 rounds .... but that would mean a judge would be giving all the close rounds .... usually you don't give all the close rounds to the guy who has to show that he deserves to take the title away from the champ. He may take some but in most cases not all .... UNLESS ITS CLEAR!
What's so hard to understand?

[hugh grant]

LOL I must have hit a nerve..The only one butthurt is you buddy,and the other Pac nuthuggers...You keep mentioning experts,but fail to come to the realization that the judges the night of the fight are not only experts but do this for a living...Funny thing is the one judge with a very suspect history is the one who scored the fight for Pac..He also scored Rios over Abril if I'm not mistaken...Don't worry about how I post,you don't like what I have to say don't respond...But don't get all hurt about it bro..Just deal with the facts at hand..LMAO...

You keep contradicting yourself that all that matters is bradley got the win? Dont lie! What experts think obviously you care about, otherwise you wouldnt go on and on! Bradleys knows its important he got the win, but we also know those boos upset bradley, just like they do you. The fact that most people think bradley lost by a wide margin upsets you clearly.

So dont lie and just say that bradley got the win is the important thing for you.

[ADP02]

Bwhahahahha, so you are the one. Last time you were claiming that you had't made those comments. Dude, your a pacstan and Floyd will always be in a no win situation in your eyes, and Manny will always be in a win win situation in your eyes. Its really pointless making arguments with you since your a bigot against anything that is not Manny.

You made threads about Floyd not fighting Cotto and then made threads how Floyd electing 8oz was not fair after Floyd had signed to fight Cotto and after Floyd beat Cotto with 10oz, you then now say Cotto is passed it. You see how no matter what Floyd does your just going to hate

What? Well, you are right about one thing. I NEVER SAID THOSE WORDS!!! I never brought up gloves and didn't in my previous post as well. SO you got the wrong guy buddy!

Floyd vs Cotto should have happened when they were both undefeated. They eventually did but I was not impressed by that decision because I knew FLoyd would win against this version of Cotto. That is what happened but there was a couple of rounds which I was impressed with Cotto .... too bad he couldn't continue that for the rest of the fight. Even Cotto admitted that he was trying to get back to the form that he was in prior to the Margarito/Manny losses.

Now I want to see Manny vs FLoyd but Floyd put roadblocks and vacation so we don't have that fight. If they ever do fight, we will need to re-evaluate to see where both fighters are at. It will not be the same as if they fought in early 2010 .... same goes for Floyd vs Cotto .... what's so hard to understand?

[Boxingisfixed]

Anyone who thinks Bradley even came CLOSE to winning more then 3 rounds doesn't have an understanding of boxing...

OBVIOUSLY there was some sort of money being thrown around weather it be a rematch, a judge payout, they thought manny was past his prime and wanted to bring up the next guy...whatever.

Manny Paquiao CLEARLY won the fight and I'm not a PacMan fan... I thought he lost To Marquez... I don't see anything different in a 2nd fight...Bradley was totally outclassed.

[littlemac]

Anyone who thinks Bradley even came CLOSE to winning more then 3 rounds doesn't have an understanding of boxing...

OBVIOUSLY there was some sort of money being thrown around weather it be a rematch, a judge payout, they thought manny was past his prime and wanted to bring up the next guy...whatever.

Manny Paquiao CLEARLY won the fight and I'm not a PacMan fan... I thought he lost To Marquez... I don't see anything different in a 2nd fight...Bradley was totally outclassed.

Care to disclose what other alts you go by.You say your not a Pacfan yet you waited almost two years with out a single post from this alt, until inspired to do so when it came about Manny. Sure ofcourse your not a pacman fanAgain care to disclose what other alts you go by?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Brian Kenny + 2 judges + you + some Bradley fans + some Manny haters had it for Bradley.

The rest of the world had it for Manny.

What I stated was that even if you give Bradley the rounds he won clearly plus all the close rounds, one still can't give him 7 rounds!

So now every round had a clear winner in your books? Bradley clearly won 7 rounds and Manny clearly won 5 rounds? I say no but your statements appear to indicate that. There were several rounds that were very close and hard to call. Those rounds the judge has to pick someone. Right? I said that even if you give all the close rounds plus the clear rounds, bradley still can't find 7 rounds .... but that would mean a judge would be giving all the close rounds .... usually you don't give all the close rounds to the guy who has to show that he deserves to take the title away from the champ. He may take some but in most cases not all .... UNLESS ITS CLEAR!
What's so hard to understand?

Like I said that is not how judges are thought to score fights..Who you felt won the rd is who should get the rd..No matter if one fighter is the Champ or not..

I did not score the 7th for Bradley,a rd in which every one of the judges scored it for Bradley..Yet it was a very close rd..You have to give it to the fighter who is controlling pace and dictating the fight..Anyone who is going to tell me Manny did this for most of the rds,I'm going to tell them to get their glasses checked...

[littlemac]

What? Well, you are right about one thing. I NEVER SAID THOSE WORDS!!! I never brought up gloves and didn't in my previous post as well. SO you got the wrong guy buddy!

Floyd vs Cotto should have happened when they were both undefeated. They eventually did but I was not impressed by that decision because I knew FLoyd would win against this version of Cotto. That is what happened but there was a couple of rounds which I was impressed with Cotto .... too bad he couldn't continue that for the rest of the fight. Even Cotto admitted that he was trying to get back to the form that he was in prior to the Margarito/Manny losses.

Now I want to see Manny vs FLoyd but Floyd put roadblocks and vacation so we don't have that fight. If they ever do fight, we will need to re-evaluate to see where both fighters are at. It will not be the same as if they fought in early 2010 .... same goes for Floyd vs Cotto .... what's so hard to understand?

You made a thread about how Floyd was ducking Cotto.
Then after Floyd signs to fight with Cotto.

You then made a thread about how Floyd was unfair to want 8oz.
Then after Floyd ended beating Cotto with 10oz..

You now make post how Cotto is shot and pass it.

Way to go Pacstan