Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch

[Alx.]

hahahahahahaahha no

[The Tase]

thread subscribed.

Im gonna love bumping this thread some time in the near future.

[littlemac]

hahahahahahaahha no

This coming from an idiot how couldn't admit that Mosley never failed a drug test after getting owned trying to protect Pac bwahahahah....I see you a mile away Pac-stan

[ADP02]

I think the question next would be. Does Manny want another schooling from Bradley? I don't think he does considering his satisfied with the fight since Manny is showing no interest in getting schooled again.

Schooling? Are you joking? I know you hate Manny but if you want to be taken seriously at the very least make your points somewhat valid.

[littlemac]

Schooling? Are you joking? I know you hate Manny but if you want to be taken seriously at the very least make your points somewhat valid.

Bradley turned it up in the second Part of the fight with an injuring that according early on. Bradley adjusted and Manny didn't. Bradley knows how to fight Pac, just like Marquez does now. Manny was only trying to still rounds with last seconds missing flurries. Manny couldn't even land cleanly against a partley emobile Bradley.

Am sorry you hate Floyd. You complained why Floyd was not fighting Cotto, then when fight was made, you complained Floyd was unfairly wanting 8oz. Then when the fight ended with 10oz, you claim Cotto was pass it. Yeah dude, your not a Pac-stan.

[CubanGuyNYC]

Why would one predict Tim beats Manny "convincingly" in a rematch? Pacquiao won their fight clearly, in my opinion. The bout was competitive, but Manny won nearly every round. It was one of the worst "big fight" robberies I've ever seen.

Boxing experts of all kinds have written about what a travesty the decision was. An officially chosen, five-judge panel unanimously scored it for Pacquiao. The decision even prompted an official investigation to determine if there was corruption involved in the judging. How often does that happen? It was simply a horrible decision.

A small minority of boxing people and fans had the fight for Bradley. Hell, there are people that actually believe Rios beat Abril. There will always be someone with a dissenting opinion....

[Rome-By-Ko]

1 - You and another 10% had it for Bradley and the rest of the world had it for Manny including a majority of Bradley fans and Floyd fans .... plus my understanding is that they had a panel of judges review the fight and they all had it for Manny ...... so I'm quite confident that Manny won.

2- Well, in some ways, what you said is what I meant as far as respect someone's power. The only concern that I can see from Manny's perspective is not to get caught with one of Bradley's wild punches. Meaning, getting hit but not seeing the punch as that can have an affect even if Bradley isn't the hardest puncher. Especially if Manny would get caught continuously.

BUT what I saw .....

Manny smiled at the cameras after Bradley's hardest shots .... Bradley has OK power but Manny was not appearing concerned. Manny DID go toe to toe with Bradley and Manny always came out ahead in those battles .... so you are incorrect here. Manny did fight "bit reckless" as you put it .... What Manny didn't do was go for the kill. With Bradley having feet problems, I doubt that Bradley can give his best shots. So Manny didn't have to worry as much as when Bradley has 2 good feet ....

Manny thought he was way ahead on the scores so he took the foot off of the pedal a bit but there were very few rounds where one would say Bradley clearly won that round. Certainly not 7 and not even 6 ..... while its still a stretch, the best you can give is 5 perhaps IF YOU GIVE HIM ALL OF THE CLOSE ROUNDS!!! Is that what you did? Still 5 rounds doesn't give you a win but to take the belt off of the champ, you need to win the rounds decisively ..... you can't expect to get all of the toss-up rounds ..... but even then, bradley should still have lost.

Look, you are arguing on something that is being stated as very controversial. Many people think it's due to Arum or those 3 judges that you are defending .... not because Bradley won.

Only some (10%) Bradley fans and Manny haters are saying that Bradley won and that is expected .... you just happen to be one of the 10% ......

Is Brian Kenny a Bradley fan??If I'm not mistaken he is a Pac fan,and he saw it for Bradley 7-5 or maybe 8 to 4..It was a close fight,and swing rds went to what the person scoring the fight is looking for..Just so happens that the judges favored Bradley..At the end of the day it was no robbery,if ya had Pac winning I'm fine with that..But this was no 11-1 10-2 or 9-3 fight...Which is really my point,it ws close..In a close fight it can go eitherway...

Oh and the whole Pac is a Champ so he should win close rds is not the waay a judge is trained to watch fights either..The fighter who wins the rd wins the rd no matter if that fighter is a Champ or not..

[lfc19titles]

neither fighter got their ass kicked dude, what are u saying, what are u seeing.... its hard to say who even won.... all im implying is that bradley hung in there with an supposedly a class fighter on a bum "set" of ankles and out worked him, adjusting to his stlye in the later rounds, throwing a solid jab.... u talking a bunch of

If it is difficult to see who won, then you are watching the wrong sport my friend. Go to UFC...

Pacman won the fight clearly, without a doubt bar in the minds of ******s (dumb stuck up 2 judges who gave one of the worst scoring in the history of the spot)

the fact 97 percent of the press row had pacman winning should say it all really.

[lfc19titles]

Is Brian Kenny a Bradley fan??If I'm not mistaken he is a Pac fan,and he saw it for Bradley 7-5 or maybe 8 to 4..It was a close fight,and swing rds went to what the person scoring the fight is looking for..Just so happens that the judges favored Bradley..At the end of the day it was no robbery,if ya had Pac winning I'm fine with that..But this was no 11-1 10-2 or 9-3 fight...Which is really my point,it ws close..In a close fight it can go eitherway...

It was a clear 8-4 fight....9-3 for pac fans and 7-5 for bradley fans like yourself mate, either way pac wins...

thing is man, you know and I know Pac won, bradley got a gift, the whole boxing community knows who won, that is good enough. Arum is a scum bag who needs to be put in a retirement home for his dodgy deals behind the scenes

i know you are a sound poster, you know it was a clear pac win

[ADP02]

Bradley turned it up in the second Part of the fight with an injuring that according early on. Bradley adjusted and Manny didn't. Bradley knows how to fight Pac, just like Marquez does now. Manny was only trying to still rounds with last seconds missing flurries. Manny couldn't even land cleanly against a partley emobile Bradley.

Am sorry you hate Floyd. You complained why Floyd was not fighting Cotto, then when fight was made, you complained Floyd was unfairly wanting 8oz. Then when the fight ended with 10oz, you claim Cotto was pass it. Yeah dude, your not a Pac-stan.

Bradley didn't turn on anything. By the time we hit the last few rounds, everyone watching that fight knew that the results were academic UNTIL we all heard those bogus scores.

If the fight was at least close then I can say its just a matter of opinion and it went the way it went but not this fight.

Floyd should have fought Cotto BEFORE Cotto lost to Margarito. Instead he went on vacation. Hmmm, where have I heard that before? After the Margarito and Manny beating, he fought a few guys that he should have beat. So there was nothing to state that Cotto had a chance against Floyd. The fight happened too late. The nice thing about the fight was that Cotto did better than expected but he wasn't consistant enough to win that BUT if I closed my eyes, I would have done just like you are doing and say "Cotto schooled Floyd" because he did more in one round to Floyd than Bradley did the entire fight to Manny ... but that is not what happened. Floyd won.