Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch

[Rome-By-Ko]

You keep contradicting yourself that all that matters is bradley got the win? Dont lie! What experts think obviously you care about, otherwise you wouldnt go on and on! Bradleys knows its important he got the win, but we also know those boos upset bradley, just like they do you. The fact that most people think bradley lost by a wide margin upsets you clearly.

So dont lie and just say that bradley got the win is the important thing for you.

Your butthurt is showing,lol..

[allupnem]

Bradley took rds 1 - 3
Pac "suspectly" took rds 4 -5 (after a brutal shot in the 4th that caused bradley to twist his ankle)
Rounds 6 through 12 is a toss up, however bradley stuck with the jab all night stayed aggressive and landed some decent shots down the stretch.

I felt manny could have won this fight, however it seems he felt in his mind that those last mintue inaccurate flurries that gets the crowd going would have sealed the deal. thats just not the case, bradley landed the cleaner shots with the jab all night.... NEVER TRUST HBO COMP....BOX With a healed ankle and the way bradley adjusted to manny's style down the stretch I honestly dnt think a rematch would be in manny's best interest.

You're clearly a moron and to ****** to be commenting on boxing

[littlemac]

Your butthurt is showing,lol..

His been butt hurt since Floyd introduce the turnbuckle to Hatton.

[ADP02]

Like I said that is not how judges are thought to score fights..Who you felt won the rd is who should get the rd..No matter if one fighter is the Champ or not..

I did not score the 7th for Bradley,a rd in which every one of the judges scored it for Bradley..Yet it was a very close rd..You have to give it to the fighter who is controlling pace and dictating the fight..Anyone who is going to tell me Manny did this for most of the rds,I'm going to tell them to get their glasses checked...

Yup, judge has no choice but to choose a winner but there are close rounds and that is where the judge has to make a decision on who to give the close rounds. The judge has no choice even though in their heads they think it was even or too close to call. We all know that.


What 90% are saying is that Manny won. You and 10% are saying that Bradley won.

When its a close fight, then I can say that its just a matter of opinion. While you can still have your opinion and I give you that right. I'm just saying that being a fan of Bradley has taken the better of you in this one. You are looking at the rounds and finding something that is or isn't there for Bradley.

Bradley didn't deserve the win but like I said in previous posts, he won and we must move on. Bradley shouldn't think about giving the belt back because the official ruling by the 3 judges stand and he has every right to keep it.

Yes the judges had it for Bradley but they also had it for Brandon Rios in his fight against Abril but those judges were wrong too! That's what the controversy was about .... the bad scoring. It's not just about Bradley fans saying his guy won and Manny fans saying his guy won. Heck, many Bradley fans admitted that Manny won. Many Floyd fans admitted that Manny won. The fight was not close ....

[ADP02]

You made a thread about how Floyd was ducking Cotto.
Then after Floyd signs to fight with Cotto.

You then made a thread about how Floyd was unfair to want 8oz.
Then after Floyd ended beating Cotto with 10oz..

You now make post how Cotto is shot and pass it.

Way to go Pacstan

I have not created such a thread. DO a search and you will see that you are definitely wrong.

By the way, I have not started a thread in about 2 years now .... so you will be searching for nothing! So that is why its not a question about me forgetting or intentionally telling you a lie ... I JUST HAVEN'T STARTED A THREAD IN YEARS!!!! So again, you are completely wrong and I'm not the guy that you think that I am.

As for what I think about Cotto, it is based on what I see. Cotto prior to fighting Floyd lost to Margarito and Manny. He then beat the one-legged Foreman, the all bark and no bite Mayorga and the one-eyed Margarito. So I didn't see anything in his recent resume that would indicate that Cotto can beat Floyd at this stage in his career and that is what I stated. Nothing controversial about my statement, at least not that I can see. If Cotto would have beat some top fighters recently then you may have a point but the truth of the matter is EVERYONE knows that Floyd vs Cotto happened too late .... we wanted that to happen about 4-5 years ago.

So let me know when you find my threads ... I will be waiting and waiting!

[Rome-By-Ko]

Yup, judge has no choice but to choose a winner but there are close rounds and that is where the judge has to make a decision on who to give the close rounds. The judge has no choice even though in their heads they think it was even or too close to call. We all know that.


What 90% are saying is that Manny won. You and 10% are saying that Bradley won.

When its a close fight, then I can say that its just a matter of opinion. While you can still have your opinion and I give you that right. I'm just saying that being a fan of Bradley has taken the better of you in this one. You are looking at the rounds and finding something that is or isn't there for Bradley.

Bradley didn't deserve the win but like I said in previous posts, he won and we must move on. Bradley shouldn't think about giving the belt back because the official ruling by the 3 judges stand and he has every right to keep it.

Yes the judges had it for Bradley but they also had it for Brandon Rios in his fight against Abril but those judges were wrong too! That's what the controversy was about .... the bad scoring. It's not just about Bradley fans saying his guy won and Manny fans saying his guy won. Heck, many Bradley fans admitted that Manny won. Many Floyd fans admitted that Manny won. The fight was not close ....

This fight was no Rios Abril or Pwill Lara,the fact that you acknowledge there was close rds proves that..So to bring those fights up in the matter of this fight is pointless...I really don't care about how many %seen the fight for Manny..All I know is what I seen,I can respect everyone's view on the fight don't mean I have to agree with it(that street goes both ways)..

At the end of the day Bradley won a close fight,where very experience judges scored the fight for Bradley..They all seen the same thing(a close fight),and they are paid to watch the fight unlike 100%of the fans(who were drunk or did not have the best view)or the media(who could be doing god knows what while the fight is taking place)..I can see if the cards were all over the place..But all three judges had the same card,oh and since you brought up the Rios fight..The only judge who scored the fight for Pac,also scored the fight for Rios..Who you just said got a gift from the judges..

[ADP02]

This fight was no Rios Abril or Pwill Lara,the fact that you acknowledge there was close rds proves that..So to bring those fights up in the matter of this fight is pointless...I really don't care about how many %seen the fight for Manny..All I know is what I seen,I can respect everyone's view on the fight don't mean I have to agree with it(that street goes both ways)..

At the end of the day Bradley won a close fight,where very experience judges scored the fight for Bradley..They all seen the same thing(a close fight),and they are paid to watch the fight unlike 100%of the fans(who were drunk or did not have the best view)or the media(who could be doing god knows what while the fight is taking place)..I can see if the cards were all over the place..But all three judges had the same card,oh and since you brought up the Rios fight..The only judge who scored the fight for Pac,also scored the fight for Rios..Who you just said got a gift from the judges..

I said there were some close rounds but the fight should have been a win for Manny.

See, judges make mistakes. So that was the controversy. You are just trying to convince the rest of us that those judges had it right and we all had it wrong.

I didn't drink that night but there is still something called replays of the fight and most of those who did that had Manny winning.

So I guess we can agree to disagree on this one .

[Rome-By-Ko]

I said there were some close rounds but the fight should have been a win for Manny.

See, judges make mistakes. So that was the controversy. You are just trying to convince the rest of us that those judges had it right and we all had it wrong.

I didn't drink that night but there is still something called replays of the fight and most of those who did that had Manny winning.

So I guess we can agree to disagree on this one .

Your last sentence I agree with..I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything..I'm just speaking my peace and telling it how I saw it,nothing more nothing less..

[littlemac]

I have not created such a thread. DO a search and you will see that you are definitely wrong.

By the way, I have not started a thread in about 2 years now .... so you will be searching for nothing! So that is why its not a question about me forgetting or intentionally telling you a lie ... I JUST HAVEN'T STARTED A THREAD IN YEARS!!!! So again, you are completely wrong and I'm not the guy that you think that I am.

As for what I think about Cotto, it is based on what I see. Cotto prior to fighting Floyd lost to Margarito and Manny. He then beat the one-legged Foreman, the all bark and no bite Mayorga and the one-eyed Margarito. So I didn't see anything in his recent resume that would indicate that Cotto can beat Floyd at this stage in his career and that is what I stated. Nothing controversial about my statement, at least not that I can see. If Cotto would have beat some top fighters recently then you may have a point but the truth of the matter is EVERYONE knows that Floyd vs Cotto happened too late .... we wanted that to happen about 4-5 years ago.

So let me know when you find my threads ... I will be waiting and waiting!

Those threads got deleted, but doesn't change the fact that you

1. Bit(h about Floyd not fighting Cotto.

2. Bit(hed about Floyd wanting 8oz. with Cotto.

3. Bit(hed about how Cotto is now passed it after Floyd beat him with the Gloves you where crying that they weren't using at first.

Floyd or anyone not Pac, can't win over your bigotry.

[HeroBando]

This fight was no Rios Abril or Pwill Lara.

It wasn't PWill Lara for sure, PWill outthrew Lara by a lot, landed similar, never stopped doing what he does best. He also won 4 rounds clean, you know, how Bradley won round 10.