Originally posted by AIR_KENG
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by AIR_KENGSo your fiction statement does not have any weight to it then, does it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostBut my fact statement does..Which in reality is all that matters...
Yes its fiction that you think it wasnt one sided, and its fact that you are butt hurt the fact most eperts think it was one sided wide margin win. Your bradley got the win no one believes he deserves so go away now.Last edited by hugh grant; 07-04-2012, 10:40 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostYour bradley got the win so why troll threads day after day? I can leave threads for days and weeks, yet when i view the thread your name is up as the last post? You are the one without credibilty, and i dont believe you think the bradley and Pac fight was close, and you can blame yourself for making me think that..
Yes its fiction that you think it wasnt one sided, and its fact that you are butt hurt the fact most eperts think it was one sided wide margin win. Your bradley got the win no one believes he deserves so go away now.Last edited by Rome-By-Ko; 07-04-2012, 10:55 AM.
Comment
-
Damn 13 pages lmao? Pac wins again in rematch. Fact is you wouldnt serious money on Bradley in the rematch. This is just a troll thread, you sir need to get some punani.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bhayes21151 View PostBradley took rds 1 - 3
Pac "suspectly" took rds 4 -5 (after a brutal shot in the 4th that caused bradley to twist his ankle)
Rounds 6 through 12 is a toss up, however bradley stuck with the jab all night stayed aggressive and landed some decent shots down the stretch.
I felt manny could have won this fight, however it seems he felt in his mind that those last mintue inaccurate flurries that gets the crowd going would have sealed the deal. thats just not the case, bradley landed the cleaner shots with the jab all night.... NEVER TRUST HBO COMP....BOX With a healed ankle and the way bradley adjusted to manny's style down the stretch I honestly dnt think a rematch would be in manny's best interest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post1.It's your opinion as well as others,I totally can see a case for Bradley winning..The biggest one being I felt he won more rds..
2.I don't agree that you have to respect someones power..Look at Cotto Paulie M,how about even Bradley vs Alexander,or even Maidana vs Ortiz..When a fighter senses that he took your best shot and he is doing damage to his opponent he goes a bit reckless because he feels his opponent has nothing to threaten him with..That is not the way Manny fought,Manny fought like he did not want to eat something to clean the whole night...Don't be fooled by commentators or even the fact Pac did not eat big shots(clean anyway)..Pac kept his hands up most of the damn fight(when do you ever see him do that)Pac usually takes risk that gets him caught because he has lost respect for his opponent...Bradley's punches had an effect on Pac and as I said before,Pac was the only one damage after heated exchanges..The busted mouth..
3.Manny clearly lost the later rds,he was spent and very tired looking..Like I said this came from body work and having a fighter who made him fight when he did not want to and also made him miss a ton...Bradley was effective throughout the fight..Pac showed you how much from the 9th rd on imo..He lost those rds in my book..He also lost rds 1-3 before Bradley hurt his foot...
At the end of the day 115-113 score means there was a close fight happening..In a close fight you can never say one fighter did not deserve the nod over the other..We can all have are opinions on who we thought won,but 3 professional judges(damn the media this is these guys profession)saw a close fight..Then the judge came on HBO and owned Jim and still told you live on tv that it was a close fight..Like I said in a close fight anyone can win...It's not hard to see a lot of rds was close,and Bradley did enough to pull it off bro imo and Pac did just enough to lose...
2- Well, in some ways, what you said is what I meant as far as respect someone's power. The only concern that I can see from Manny's perspective is not to get caught with one of Bradley's wild punches. Meaning, getting hit but not seeing the punch as that can have an affect even if Bradley isn't the hardest puncher. Especially if Manny would get caught continuously.
BUT what I saw .....
Manny smiled at the cameras after Bradley's hardest shots .... Bradley has OK power but Manny was not appearing concerned. Manny DID go toe to toe with Bradley and Manny always came out ahead in those battles .... so you are incorrect here. Manny did fight "bit reckless" as you put it .... What Manny didn't do was go for the kill. With Bradley having feet problems, I doubt that Bradley can give his best shots. So Manny didn't have to worry as much as when Bradley has 2 good feet ....
Manny thought he was way ahead on the scores so he took the foot off of the pedal a bit but there were very few rounds where one would say Bradley clearly won that round. Certainly not 7 and not even 6 ..... while its still a stretch, the best you can give is 5 perhaps IF YOU GIVE HIM ALL OF THE CLOSE ROUNDS!!! Is that what you did? Still 5 rounds doesn't give you a win but to take the belt off of the champ, you need to win the rounds decisively ..... you can't expect to get all of the toss-up rounds ..... but even then, bradley should still have lost.
Look, you are arguing on something that is being stated as very controversial. Many people think it's due to Arum or those 3 judges that you are defending .... not because Bradley won.
Only some (10%) Bradley fans and Manny haters are saying that Bradley won and that is expected .... you just happen to be one of the 10% ......
Comment
Comment