Originally posted by Frozencat
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley on Khan: I'll Take Peterson's Sloppy Seconds!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Money_May View PostLol @ junior the quitter ****ter witter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brick wall View Posthmm...looks like these floyd fanatics have become bradley apologists all of a sudden.
one things for sure...when khan was *****ting on bradley, tim refused any kind of verbal confrontation. he's only talking back now that he's signed up with top rank.
i wish he didn't do that because i favored him to win when that matchup was first planned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ma51f View PostKhan needs to concentrate on gracia right now, will be very tough and a geniune 50/50 fight.
Bradley needs to stop acting like he won, clearly lost and you could tell by his face he knew he lost.
Khan/ bradly would be great but id really like pacman to rematch him first
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Lowkey- View PostAnother one of the people confusing boxing with rocket science. Just for the record I have been watching boxing for most of my life its really not that complicated in terms of judging fights and don't come back with crap about me not understanding the sport. There are people who have been in and around boxing with way more experience of the sport than yourself who also believe Pac was robbed.
I don't know what's worse Pac fans going on about slow motion replays after JMM3
Or Bradley fans acting like you need to be a boxing genius to score a fight correctly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostMaidana was crap too and we all saw Khan run from him. I don't see how Maidana is any better than Danny Garcia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostAmir Khan is probably the most overrated fighter today--a six round pug with amateur skills. I would say "he'll get exposed one day" but it's already happened like three times.
Comment
-
This is just my opinion but it goes with the masses I guess. Juan Manuel Marquez was robbed against Manny Pacquiao last November and Manny Pacquiao was robbed the month of June against Timothy Bradley. The verdict is a land slide for both arguments concerning JMM and Pacquiao. I have been reading all of the comments so far and i feel like there are bias Bradley fans and bias Khan fans on this thread. As for me personally. I never believed that Khan could beat Bradley off of his style alone. you have to stay active to keep Bradley at bay and Khan gets a lil discourage under pressure and Bradley seems to be a sturdy fighter even if he has no power. Mentally I'll give the edge to Bradley. I'm taking the Peterson fight as a measuring stick for Bradley and Khan. Bradley dominated Peterson and Khan ran from him. No triangle theories for me but rather look at it like...... Khan couldn't handle pressure while Bradley can neutralize pressure and switch up. Also, dudes have to factor in that Bradley had bad ankles and feet in the Pac fight. Not saying Bradley would have dominated but even injured Pac could not get him out of there and Bradley had him missing a lot. I pick Tim over Khan all day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Postbrick strikes again, wtf is this ****?? we all know why bradley went around the khan fight. that has nothing to do with whether he'd fight him now tho. theres absolutely no reason he wouldnt in fact.
i'd still favor him to beat khan but let's not pretend like he didn't open himself up for criticism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brick wall View Postto get the pac fight...i know. i just don't like that he didn't talk back then and now he's talking. he let khan **** on him.
i'd still favor him to beat khan but let's not pretend like he didn't open himself up for criticism.
Comment
Comment