Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley on Khan: I'll Take Peterson's Sloppy Seconds!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
    Actually I'm pointing out how ignorant it is to say Bradley is not in Khan's class. Care to back that up with any facts we should know about? Or are you just going to continue to cheerlead Khan with no basis.
    Cheerlead Khan? I picked him to win a fight I'm not the one doing the cheerleading.

    I'm also not the one trying to justifying my pick with triangle theories.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by -Lowkey- View Post
      He is coming off a loss, the fact that he was gifted a decision dose not mean it should be viewed otherwise.
      He wasn't gifted squat.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by -Lowkey- View Post
        Cheerlead Khan? I picked him to win a fight I'm not the one doing the cheerleading.

        I'm also not the one trying to justifying my pick with triangle theories.
        You are one of the biggest Khan cheerleaders on this site. Just sayin...

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by -Lowkey- View Post
          Cheerlead Khan? I picked him to win a fight I'm not the one doing the cheerleading.

          I'm also not the one trying to justifying my pick with triangle theories.
          I was referring to Weebler. If you were paying attention you would see that original post was directed toward's him. And the "triangle theory" is further evidence that it's ****** to imply Bradley is not in Khan's class as a fighter. Just really ****** if you are truly following their careers and not just looking at what side of the world they live in. And the Prescott fight is not a "triangle theory" considering he didn't fight Bradley. It's an example of what happened when Khan was cracked hard. Bradley got up and beat Holt convincingly. Khan was knocked silly.
          Last edited by joseph5620; 06-21-2012, 03:00 PM.

          Comment


          • #95
            Khan, all flash no substance.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
              I was referring to Weebler. If you were paying attention you would see that original post was directed toward's him. And the "triangle theory" is further evidence that it's ****** to imply Bradley is not in Khan's class as a fighter. Just really ****** if you are truly following their careers and not just looking at what side of the world they live in. And the Prescott fight is not a "triangle theory considering he didn't fight Bradley. It's an example of what happened when Khan was cracked hard. Bradley got up and beat Holt. Khan was knocked silly.
              The UK fans swear by Khan, hate Mayweather, and think Calzaghe is a legend. Boggles my mind.
              Last edited by GodInFleshSuit; 06-21-2012, 03:04 PM.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                He wasn't gifted squat.
                I don't believe he was either. But many of these "fans" are too rabid to waste time arguing with.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Lol at people saying Bradley got the W And that's all that matters then have the audacity to turn around and say other people aren't fans of the sport? Well there's something called karma and when it comes around I don't expect b1tching

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                    Winning a questionable decision is not "coming off a loss. Bradley W12 Pacquiao whether you like it or not. Bradley has the belt and it goes in the record books as a win. So he's not "coming off a loss" and has every right to state who he want's to fight next. Deal with it because you can't change it.
                    I'm not trying to change anything, I'm fully aware boxing has suffered from corruption throughout its history and its not going to change now.

                    Bradley was gifted a decision its not the same as legitimately winning a fight ill give Bradley credit the day I give Holyfield credit for drawing with Lewis in there first fight.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by -Lowkey- View Post
                      I'm not trying to change anything, I'm fully aware boxing has suffered from corruption throughout its history and its not going to change now.

                      Bradley was gifted a decision its not the same as legitimately winning a fight ill give Bradley credit the day I give Holyfield credit for drawing with Lewis in there first fight.
                      No comparison between those two fights. Pacquiao was no where near as dominant as Lewis was in that fight. Unless you count all of the punches he missed like jim Lampley does in every one of his fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP