Originally posted by Frozencat
Comments Thread For: Bradley on Khan: I'll Take Peterson's Sloppy Seconds!
Collapse
-
-
But you said he never came over to the UK and Witter quit after he fought Bradley against Alexander and Alexander quit against Bradley with the same injury excuse as Witter to Alexander. Even after the Pac fight I still think Bradley style is too much for Khan because Khan has no answer for pressure. Tim had 2 broke ankles and Pac couldn't even finish him off. Khan is overrated by far.Comment
-
hmm...looks like these floyd fanatics have become bradley apologists all of a sudden.
one things for sure...when khan was *****ting on bradley, tim refused any kind of verbal confrontation. he's only talking back now that he's signed up with top rank.
i wish he didn't do that because i favored him to win when that matchup was first planned.Comment
-
Like Pacquiao face after the 3rd Marquez fight before the water bottle was thrown at his head.Comment
-
Another one of the people confusing boxing with rocket science. Just for the record I have been watching boxing for most of my life its really not that complicated in terms of judging fights and don't come back with crap about me not understanding the sport. There are people who have been in and around boxing with way more experience of the sport than yourself who also believe Pac was robbed.
I don't know what's worse Pac fans going on about slow motion replays after JMM3
Or Bradley fans acting like you need to be a boxing genius to score a fight correctly.Comment
-
Amir Khan is probably the most overrated fighter today--a six round pug with amateur skills. I would say "he'll get exposed one day" but it's already happened like three times.Comment
-
u didnt know??? theres an excuse for each time. in prescott it was because he was killing himself to make weight. with maidana, he fought well in the early rounds so he was impressive enough. against mc closkey, it was becacuse mc closkey didnt wanna stand in front of him and fight and we all know what the new excuse against peterson was. sure, some of that stuff may be true but at the end of the day, whats most glaring is khans style is weak, his defense is non existent and he fights for half a fight. not one of his fans can dispute these things yet they swear by the guy.Comment
-
This is just my opinion but it goes with the masses I guess. Juan Manuel Marquez was robbed against Manny Pacquiao last November and Manny Pacquiao was robbed the month of June against Timothy Bradley. The verdict is a land slide for both arguments concerning JMM and Pacquiao. I have been reading all of the comments so far and i feel like there are bias Bradley fans and bias Khan fans on this thread. As for me personally. I never believed that Khan could beat Bradley off of his style alone. you have to stay active to keep Bradley at bay and Khan gets a lil discourage under pressure and Bradley seems to be a sturdy fighter even if he has no power. Mentally I'll give the edge to Bradley. I'm taking the Peterson fight as a measuring stick for Bradley and Khan. Bradley dominated Peterson and Khan ran from him. No triangle theories for me but rather look at it like...... Khan couldn't handle pressure while Bradley can neutralize pressure and switch up. Also, dudes have to factor in that Bradley had bad ankles and feet in the Pac fight. Not saying Bradley would have dominated but even injured Pac could not get him out of there and Bradley had him missing a lot. I pick Tim over Khan all day.Comment
-
i'd still favor him to beat khan but let's not pretend like he didn't open himself up for criticism.Comment
-
Bradley actually said that he doesn't care if people say he ducked Khan because at the end of the day, it's about him getting paid. If Bradley ain't defending it then no one else should. I personally feel that Khan ain't good enough to be ducked but that is just my opinion.Comment
Comment