Toney voted top Heavyweight among all

[badblood]

hey morons, james toney is 5'9, no way he gets by wlad with such a huge physical disadvantage.

this is the same forum where people went on for days about how 2 pounds were the reason castillo beat corrales but you same morons cant admit that a 9 inch height disadvantage would get toney killed by wlad.

toney has the best skills at heavy because he isnt a heavy. its just like antonio tarver will have great boxing skliis at heavy if he tries but he'll still get knocked the **** out.

Some of the ******est fans in boxing post here for sure.

[moochi]

a load of crap is toney, and a load of crap is any site/group which 'think' he is a top h/w.

[Moon]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..z..z..z...z...z...z .....z.....z.......z

Huh, wha? You guys talking Heavies again? Oh.



ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..z..z..z...z...z...z .....z.....z.......z

[TuPrincipe]

Some of the ******est fans in boxing post here for sure.

His post made sense juniour.

[badblood]

His post made sense juniour.

What made sense?? Half the **** that comes out of here doesnt make a lick of sense.

[Hitman932]

His post made sense juniour.

I think badblood was agreeing with me and you mistook him for meaning i was one of the ******est fans?? im confused either way. i thought my post made sense..

[MikeHunt]

some boxing website held a voting on who is the best heavyweight around now james toney was voted as number 1 and wladimir klitschko was number 2, read up on it bellow 2http://www.**********.com/pages/free6105.htm

who do u think is the best heavyweight right now, I think Wladimir Klitschko and Lamon Brewster are the top guys right now...

Womens bowling is more exciting than the Heavyweight division.

[badblood]

I think badblood was agreeing with me and you mistook him for meaning i was one of the ******est fans?? im confused either way. i thought my post made sense..

I was agreeing with you bro.

[j]

so toney was voted as the best current heavyweight? that is a bit weird considering he has no title and has fought very little at heavyweight. actually, it sounds a bit deluded now that i think about it. it was probably a poll based on american popularity.

on a side note - sick of people thinking wlad got knocked down 3 times legally and almost got ko'd by peter. if you don't know what a rabbit punch is, do yourself a favor and google up the rules and regulations of professional boxing.

last thing, didn't see a hopkins/taylor 2 thread(been busy lately, so i probably missed them), but i thought hopkins did just enough to win. bull**** call by the judges on that one.

[Bozo_no no]

on a side note - sick of people thinking wlad got knocked down 3 times legally and almost got ko'd by peter. if you don't know what a rabbit punch is, do yourself a favor and google up the rules and regulations of professional boxing.

I'm equally as sick of people using that as an excuse to make them selves feel better about Wlad hitting the deck another 3 times.

One of the three knock downs was from a straight right hand.

The two everyone always cries about were the result of accumulation of punches after Wlad was hurt earlier in the frame, and after several seconds of stumbling around on no legs.

After getting stunned, he was stumbling all around, and grabbing on to Peter.

In doing so, he was constantly turning his head away from punches. In doing so, he was directrly at fault for exposing the back of his head to punches thrown at his head.

This, in combonation with the fact he was stumbling around on no legs, are why the knock downs counted, and rightfully so.

Wlad did escape with a win in that fight, winning it narrowly on the cards despite winning the majority of the rounds.