Tweet
jousha clottey must of have won
-
jousha clottey must of have won -
not to mention jmm's face is like that due to a headbuttOriginally posted by Mannie Phresh View PostComment
-
nobody cares about these fights that boxing history will forget.
The only fights boxing history really really remembers is the huge heavyweight robberies.
Which is the Holyfield robbery against Lewis .
Holyfield 1 was ruled a draw
Lewis dominated every second of that fight and made Holyfield look like a ******.Comment
-
As a rule I think Official results should be accepted if it's a close fight and not accepted if it's a robbery. Roy Jones won the Gold Medal and Sta. Cruz over Casa....etc....etc.....Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostI personally don't understand people who go by official results even though they saw what happened with their own eyes. It makes no logical sense.
Having said that, Pacquaio-Marquez 3 is in no way comparable to Holyfield-Lewis I
I see turbotard just got unbanned so he's trying his usual brand of not so subtle trolling to make up for lost time
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View PostOriginally posted by Mars Volta View Post
jousha clottey must of have wonOriginally posted by Mars Volta View Post
FACTS:
-Marquez is 0-1-2 vs Pacquiao
-In their last fight, Marquez was OUT PUNCHED & OUT LANDED BY Pacquiao tracked by compubox numbers.
add the fact that marquez face looked worse for the wear, you have what clearly was a correct score. A Pacquiao win. We have video of the fight. Its quite clear the video back up the facts INSTEAD OF YOUR HATE FOR PAC giving every benefit of the doubt to Marquez.
As for you morons referencing the clottey fight, you might have a point had clottey not been also OUT PUNCHED AND OUT LANDED by pac in that fight.Comment
-
robberies?Originally posted by turbotime View Post
blatant ones?
sure
close fight you dont agree with: of course not.Comment
-
Lewis was much more robbed against Holyfield on a much bigger stageOriginally posted by New England View Post
then Lil Marquez and Lil Pacquaio
anyone who thinks the Marquez Pac robbery is 'the same level' as lewis holyfield probably never watched a heavyweight fight once in their livesComment
-
dont be such a moron.Originally posted by Toyman View Posti give marquez credit for winning 4 rounds and looking like this
You can twist facts how you like, but the pic doesnt lie. Nor does the judges' verdict
some fighters mark, swell and cut easier than others. on top of that the cleanest punches (on the jaw/chin) dont leave any mark, swelling or cut whatsoever.
if manny gave marquez a one sided beating that would be one thing but we all know thats not the case. marquez face is just more prone to damage than pacquiaos and he landed a much higher percentage of his punches flush on the jaw as oposed to high on the head like pacquiao.
the judge thing is even more ******, we all know there are bad decisions in boxing. wether this is one or not is up for debate but saying "judges dont lie" is no argument. its just proof you are a moron who shouldnt be taken seriously. fighters get robbed all the time, judges verdict are often a lie.
if you think manny won make a real argument, posting pictures and saying judges are never wrong isnt a real argument. clean effective punching, effective aggression, ring generalship and defense. those are the criterias for scoring a fight. make a real case for your boy or say nothing at all punk b.itch.Comment
-
Boxing isnt scored on how your face looks after a fight nor what COMPUBOX says as many here like to throw around.Originally posted by Toyman View Posti give marquez credit for winning 4 rounds and looking like this
You can twist facts how you like, but the pic doesnt lie. Nor does the judges' verdictComment
-
yes it is
what you see isn't always what the judges say
hell, Larryx was saying Pea drew with Chavez and lost to Ramirez
you know, because the judges said so :laugh:
when an outcome is obvious, draw your own conclusionsComment
Comment