It depends largely on the type of loss, but if it's just a clear loss or whatever, then no, you don't deserve credit at all. Why should you?
Does a journeyman deserve credit for having been a go to guy for young up and coming prospects, despite getting knocked out and losing all of them?
It's who you beat. If you give great efforts in losing fights as an underdog against top guys then you deserve some credit as you passed expectations.
Still, Irish Pat Lawlor shouldn't be considered as good as or better than Pac should he? Didn't beat these but he did fight them.
Check out this list:
Roberto Duran
Wilfred Benitez
Hector Camacho
Terry Norris
Vinny Pazienza
Rene Arredondo
John David Jackson
Joe Calzaghe
Dana Rosenblatt
Librado Andrade
Damn! Pat Lawlor must be a legend.

You shouldn't get credit for just being signed to fight someone. You get credit for what you do in a fight, whether it's surpassing expectations and doing great or beating fighters. However, you should not get credit for simply showing up.
Does a journeyman deserve credit for having been a go to guy for young up and coming prospects, despite getting knocked out and losing all of them?
It's who you beat. If you give great efforts in losing fights as an underdog against top guys then you deserve some credit as you passed expectations.
Still, Irish Pat Lawlor shouldn't be considered as good as or better than Pac should he? Didn't beat these but he did fight them.
Check out this list:
Roberto Duran
Wilfred Benitez
Hector Camacho
Terry Norris
Vinny Pazienza
Rene Arredondo
John David Jackson
Joe Calzaghe
Dana Rosenblatt
Librado Andrade
Damn! Pat Lawlor must be a legend.

You shouldn't get credit for just being signed to fight someone. You get credit for what you do in a fight, whether it's surpassing expectations and doing great or beating fighters. However, you should not get credit for simply showing up.
Comment