Is it OK To Give Fighters Credit On Their Resume When robbed?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BennyST
    Shhhh...
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 9263
    • 1,036
    • 500
    • 21,301

    #71
    Originally posted by Bushbaby
    No, not to me. Like I said If you were a supervisor at a failing company & you put supervisor down on your resume, it is accurate. I don't even see how applying for a job made this way into your comparison, but to each his own.




    Fabulous post my good man!!
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    Because a failed application is the same as a fight you fail to win.

    Neither belong on your resume.

    Seems more logical a comparison to being a supervisor at a failing company considering you have to be originally hired to gain that kind of job.

    When you fail to win a fight, it's essentially the same as failing to be hired for the job you're looking to attain.

    And again, neither belong on your resume.
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    I think if you perform well and give a tough fight it can be considered. I.e Cotto's performance against Mayweather.

    But clear loss's I don't put on a resume.
    It depends largely on the type of loss, but if it's just a clear loss or whatever, then no, you don't deserve credit at all. Why should you?

    Does a journeyman deserve credit for having been a go to guy for young up and coming prospects, despite getting knocked out and losing all of them?

    It's who you beat. If you give great efforts in losing fights as an underdog against top guys then you deserve some credit as you passed expectations.

    Still, Irish Pat Lawlor shouldn't be considered as good as or better than Pac should he? Didn't beat these but he did fight them.

    Check out this list:
    Roberto Duran
    Wilfred Benitez
    Hector Camacho
    Terry Norris
    Vinny Pazienza
    Rene Arredondo
    John David Jackson
    Joe Calzaghe
    Dana Rosenblatt
    Librado Andrade

    Damn! Pat Lawlor must be a legend.



    You shouldn't get credit for just being signed to fight someone. You get credit for what you do in a fight, whether it's surpassing expectations and doing great or beating fighters. However, you should not get credit for simply showing up.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 49989
      • 5,135
      • 270
      • 104,043

      #72
      Originally posted by BennyST
      It depends largely on the type of loss, but if it's just a clear loss or whatever, then no, you don't deserve credit at all. Why should you?

      Does a journeyman deserve credit for having been a go to guy for young up and coming prospects, despite getting knocked out and losing all of them?

      It's who you beat. If you give great efforts in losing fights as an underdog against top guys then you deserve some credit as you passed expectations.

      Still, Irish Pat Lawlor shouldn't be considered as good as or better than Pac should he? Didn't beat these but he did fight them.

      Check out this list:
      Roberto Duran
      Wilfred Benitez
      Hector Camacho
      Terry Norris
      Vinny Pazienza
      Rene Arredondo
      John David Jackson
      Joe Calzaghe
      Dana Rosenblatt
      Librado Andrade

      Damn! Pat Lawlor must be a legend.



      You shouldn't get credit for just being signed to fight someone. You get credit for what you do in a fight, whether it's surpassing expectations and doing great or beating fighters. However, you should not get credit for simply showing up.
      That's pretty much exactly what I'm saying.

      You're resume isn't who you fight, it's who you beat.

      But of course, logically, you still get somewhat credit for giving a tough fight to another ATG, especially if you're supposed to lose.

      But those instances are reasonably rare.

      Comment

      • BennyST
        Shhhh...
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 9263
        • 1,036
        • 500
        • 21,301

        #73
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        That's pretty much exactly what I'm saying.

        You're resume isn't who you fight, it's who you beat.

        But of course, logically, you still get somewhat credit for giving a tough fight to another ATG, especially if you're supposed to lose.

        But those instances are reasonably rare.
        Agreed. I was just reiterating exactly what you had said.

        Comment

        • mathed
          molṑn labé
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 54551
          • 2,743
          • 2,984
          • 224,675

          #74
          Originally posted by turbotime
          Thoughts on this?

          I was always kind of on the fence about it but I can't help but give credit to Lewis in the first Holyfield fight, and to Marquez in the 3rd Pacquiao fight.
          I do...I don't really care what the corrupt judges think. I say Martinez beat Cintron via KO, Molina beat Kirkland, Abril beat Rios, Macklin beat Sturm, etc.

          Comment

          • jg77
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2012
            • 127
            • 5
            • 0
            • 6,420

            #75
            Castillo won that first fight with Mayweather. It wasn't all that close IMO, a really good fight but Castillo definitely won it.

            Abril just recently got robbed. I thought Khan won against Peterson also.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP