whats the purpose of having a drug test if the fighter test positive but their just gonna write it off with a doctor's note and let the fight go on?? i'll wait for ur answer.
It's a messed up system, I agree.
But is the right answer "Let's forget testing all together".
Its on purpose, get close to the fight as possible and then reveal it. Gives GBP few options
THis is what will happen. Peterson's lawyers will argue that a doctor prescribed him the steroids for some crap. THen they will argue that there was inconsistency with the testing procedures since the B sample was tested almost 20 days after the A
This will result in NSAC issuing him a license and with the fight only a week a way, put pressure on GBP to keep the fight on since it will be big money and no good opponent will be found in a week.
All this is being done on purpose
So we might aswell act like nothing's happened if that's the case they can't do 5hit to Lamont.
Exactly these guys are over here saying "Yay, the urine test caught Peterson".
NO! If done correctly, how drug testing is suppose to work, a legit drug tests catches a cheater "BEFORE" the fight, not several months afterwards.
What's the purpose of having a drug test if the cheater won't be caught before hand but 6 months later?
Someone please tell me, what the hell is the point of that?
Um, Peterson DID get caught before the fight, this rematch is for May 19th!.
The reason he is being implicated for the first fight is due to his own lawyers statement. There isn't any evidence that he was positive for the first fight other than what his lawyers are claiming.
Comment