Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: NSAC: Peterson Not Licensed, Took Testosterone Pellets

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by ONEBOX
    whats the purpose of having a drug test if the fighter test positive but their just gonna write it off with a doctor's note and let the fight go on?? i'll wait for ur answer.
    It's a messed up system, I agree.

    But is the right answer "Let's forget testing all together".

    This is what a certain fan base prefers.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by BuckToothed View Post
      Pac agreed to the unlimited USADA random urine tests without any cutoff.
      It was the blood tests that he wanted a cutoff initially.

      Isn't the method USADA employ for urine testing the same as VADA?
      Blood and urine... you need BOTH.

      Manny needs to stop throwing road blocks.

      Innocent people don't hide from scrutiny.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
        Its on purpose, get close to the fight as possible and then reveal it. Gives GBP few options

        THis is what will happen. Peterson's lawyers will argue that a doctor prescribed him the steroids for some crap. THen they will argue that there was inconsistency with the testing procedures since the B sample was tested almost 20 days after the A

        This will result in NSAC issuing him a license and with the fight only a week a way, put pressure on GBP to keep the fight on since it will be big money and no good opponent will be found in a week.

        All this is being done on purpose
        So we might aswell act like nothing's happened if that's the case they can't do 5hit to Lamont.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
          My point is did urine test/commission test catch Vargas, Peterson, Jones, Mosley, ect the first time around?

          These are "commission" tests are they not?


          Point is, we should've implemented random testing ions ago (including blood).

          There have been posters that have advocated regular commissioning tests for boxing matches which is wrong. We obviously need the additional tests.
          Again you're missing his point. Which one of those fights have random urine testing?

          None of them.

          Vargas and Roy were caught by the post test that the commission use.

          But, none of them were random urine testing. Which is Russian point.

          Again, not sure how much simplistic I can make his point for you.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by BuckToothed View Post
            Pac agreed to the unlimited USADA random urine tests without any cutoff.
            It was the blood tests that he wanted a cutoff initially.

            Isn't the method USADA employ for urine testing the same as VADA?
            he was not talk pac vs :chickenboy:testing he was talking about the urine test that pac take now

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
              Exactly these guys are over here saying "Yay, the urine test caught Peterson".

              NO! If done correctly, how drug testing is suppose to work, a legit drug tests catches a cheater "BEFORE" the fight, not several months afterwards.

              What's the purpose of having a drug test if the cheater won't be caught before hand but 6 months later?

              Someone please tell me, what the hell is the point of that?
              Um, Peterson DID get caught before the fight, this rematch is for May 19th!.
              The reason he is being implicated for the first fight is due to his own lawyers statement. There isn't any evidence that he was positive for the first fight other than what his lawyers are claiming.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Gino Ros View Post
                Blood and urine... you need BOTH.

                Manny needs to stop throwing road blocks.

                Innocent people don't hide from scrutiny.
                True, but advocating and demanding such test proves nothing either. Case in point Peterson.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by davis828 View Post
                  I see what you're saying. It's weird for a urine test to catch him now but not then.
                  It caught him now because it was a random test.

                  It wasn't a set date like the first fight.

                  Why are people finding this so hard to comprehend?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
                    Again you're missing his point. Which one of those fights have random urine testing?

                    None of them.

                    Vargas and Roy were caught by the post test that the commission use.

                    But, none of them were random urine testing. Which is Russian point.

                    Again, not sure how much simplistic I can make his point for you.
                    Why wasn't Peterson caught the first time around though?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
                      It caught him now because it was a random test.

                      It wasn't a set date like the first fight.

                      Why are people finding this so hard to comprehend?
                      I dont get it either

                      So many PED experts around here yet they dont get the simplest things

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP